• VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This only hurts working poor like me by making it harder for people to have quick temporary earnings. These rules are not about helping people or fairmess it’s about messing up options so people are desperate enough to lock themselves into shitty jobs rather than have any self determination.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      THANK YOU.

      Please see past the wave of downvotes to understand that someone out here appreciates your voice.

      Thank you for articulating this truth.

      These changes, to make Uber into the same kind of employment poison that is all other jobs, scares the fucking shit out of me.

    • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know about your experience, but when I drove for Uber Eats, I had to quit after a few months because they arbitrarily cut my pay by about 80%. I was wearing my car down and burning my own gas to make less than $6/hr. I was struggling too, so much that I just couldn’t afford to do that job anymore.

      Uber promised investors the moon and now they can barely afford to pay their stakeholders back, if even that. Their unsustainable business practices, in a sane world, would have done them in years ago.

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Was the $6/hr better than $0 because that’s the decision a lot of people will have to make. The pay represents the skill set. Basically have a pulse and be able to Walk from your car to a door and back. Some people need it and some can do other things. Forcing Uber to hire people as employees will leave a lot of people in the $0/hr basket that really needed to be in the $6/hr basket instead. What is a completely different conversation is whether people should have to be in this position at all but that’s not for uber to solve and they have no obligation to society to solve it.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            We have minimum wage because we have decided it’s better to force some people to zero in order that others may have a little more.

            Well, also because people refuse to process the logic on that, because acknowledging what I just said would cause them to reconsider their position.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I can’t imagine the series of incidents in your life that led you to draw such a wrong conclusion and yet call it logic.

              You’ve really never heard the phrase “race to the bottom”?

              • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’ve heard the phrase, yes. I don’t base my philosophy on whether clever-sounding phrases exist.

                There’s no evidence to suggest that lack of a minimum wage results in everyone earning essentially zero wages, which is all I can imagine that phrase to mean.

                There is, however, evidence that minimum wages lead to unemployment. There’s also evidence to suggest unemployment is a horrible state to exist in.