US presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump would also be shown the plan, President Zelensky says.
  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netEnglish
    0·
    23 days ago

    I hope it works but honestly I don’t see any path for Ukraine to recover all of its territory at this point. Barring some major shakeup that causes Russian resistance to collapse.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netEnglish
        0·
        22 days ago

        The invasion of Russia has given them at least small gains for the first time in a while but it really doesn’t change the overall situation as of right now. The territory gained is very small compared to what they’ve lost.

        Russia would have just continue letting them gain more and more territory until they have enough for some kind of exchange, but that seems unlikely. They were caught off guard, but now that they’re defending, further advances will become difficult and it’s likely to soon reach another stalemate like the other fronts.

  • Frog@lemmy.caEnglish
    0·
    23 days ago

    Mr. Zelenskyy, please show a different set of plans to Trump. He is a traitor to the US democracy, to its government, to its people, and countries in NATO.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        0·
        22 days ago

        To hedge his bets. He can’t let the future of Ukraine be entirely decided by a US election that’s out of his control.

      • Visstix@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        23 days ago

        “It may sound too ambitious for some, but it is an important plan for us,” he added, saying that he would also show the plan to both US presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.

        • einkorn@feddit.orgEnglish
          0·
          23 days ago

          This doesn’t answer my question.

          In the current situation, Trump has no influence on decision-making in regard to Ukraine. Until he is possibly elected president, he is just an unnecessary security risk.

          • Visstix@lemmy.worldEnglish
            0·
            22 days ago

            Well to answer your question, because kamala and trump could be the next US president so he doesn’t have to present it again. Should he? For several reasons, no.

          • OutlierBlue@lemmy.caEnglish
            0·
            22 days ago

            Because Trump would spill the plan to Putin. He’s already handed over documents regarding the US agents working in and around Russia, several of who “mysteriously” got caught not long after. He’s definitely a security risk.

            • einkorn@feddit.orgEnglish
              0·
              22 days ago

              Neither does your response answer my question.

              I asked why Zelenskyy SHOULD talk to Trump, not for reasons against it.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        23 days ago

        Yanks secretly want a monarchy thats why the still refer to people no longer in office by their title. Trump could get security briefings but it is apparently not happening at the moment.

        • TransplantedSconie@lemm.eeEnglish
          0·
          22 days ago

          33% do. The rest of us just want the government to do it’s job and protect us from foreign adversaries, corporations who want to poison us, and billionaires who want to go back to the feudal age.

          Unfortunately that 33% has way more pull thanks to the outdated electoral college and are unfathomably stupid thanks to lead pipes and Republicans actively sabotaging the educational system.

        • smeenz@lemmy.nzEnglish
          0·
          23 days ago

          But the only reason anyone would show plans to Trump would be to get them in front of putin, so they would be assumed to be misinformation.

          Maybe he should show trump the real plans…a bit of reverse psychology maybe ?