• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      If there were a good alternative in the sense of public channels that don’t usually get banned, my consent they would get even earlier.

      But the issue is - I don’t even know where to go to discuss shit. Despite TG being full of government trolls.

      • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Despite TG being full of government trolls.

        That’s the world we live in now. If it’s popular it will be full of trolls, government, corporate, all kind. Just somewhat popular, they are here on Lemmy too.

  • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Thank you for choosing “Tyranny as a Service!”

    How would you like this wrapped? [ ] Terrorism [X] Child porn

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Ruling class has been waging war on social media they dont have the ability to backdoor. My guess is they’d come for signal too if they didn’t use it themselves.

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      The government don’t usually need the text from your conversations, just the metadata who the person talks to, their location, etc. Signal is a US company, they surely provide all that data. It seems Telegram didn’t.

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        meta does get pointed out but not as much since meta actually does things to combat csam.

        twitter gets called out ALL the time mostly because elon himself is intervening to reinstate people who share csam because he firedall the trust and safety teams.

      • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Huh, it’s maybe as if, nooooo… it couldn’t be, the Zuck and Elon are my trusted friends, my confidants, they wouldn’t. They couldn’t. No way in hell they’d sell or otherwise compromise my personal data

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Gotta remember this is a state propaganda outlet. It’s pretty safe to assume “child protection schemes” means “complete invasion of privacy by the state”.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    “Schemes” it’s as if they know they aren’t actually protecting anyone… Like they would just let anyone torment their children if they claimed religious protections and offered a big enough bribe(I know for a fact that is how it actually works). But sure, telegram is the problem not fed bastards hunting innocent people because the bad people bribed them to leave them alone. Be a 1% or be investigated when you don’t cow toe to the 1%. Your choice apparently.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Did religions joined child protection schemes? Because they are one of the biggest child indoctrination and abuse schemes in the world.