• Blue and Orange@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    They’ve been churning out COD games every year for a long time now, doesn’t surprise me that they take such little time to develop.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      If I recall correctly they had three teams each developing their own COD on rotation. So each team would have effectively 3 years between releases. This implies this game had even less than half the dev time typically given to a COD game, but my numbers could be off.

      • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re close - each game would take an 18 month dev cycle, but they had a six month pre-production. So there were two main teams who would “trade off” each year. A third “team” (people moving in from other projects) would support whichever game was closest to release.

        It’s likely that number (16 months) includes pre-production, which is… Definitely short, and explains a lot of problems they’ve had.

        (Source: I’ve worked in games for almost 20 years and know people who’ve worked at Activision (pre Blizzard) , Activision-Blizzard, Sledgehammer)