• Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Ubisoft stock tanks to 10 year low!

    *Zooms out*

    Yeah it’s definitely star wars outlaws guys

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Not specifically SW: Outlaws, but they were given something that previously only EA made meh games with, and they decided to also make a meh game. Ubisoft really likes their meh games. See also: Assassin’s Creed #25, coming out this year!

      • accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        12 days ago

        And even EA made some decent games with the IP. I loved Jedi Fallen Order. Haven’t played Jedi survivor yet but from what I’ve gathered, it’s definitely not a total flop and even Battlefront 2-2 was decent enough.

        • gerryflap@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 days ago

          I loved Fallen Order and I loved Survivor even more. It’s the perfect follow up to Fallen Order. At launch it had quite some issues tho, which is why it wasn’t received well. Not sure how much better it is now since I never really had issues to begin with.

  • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    12 days ago

    When I hear “UbiSoft” the first word I think of is “lukewarm”. Mediocre, inoffensive junk food gaming that’s rarely so bad that it’s unplayable but also never meaningful, interesting or memorable.

    This has been their m.o. for decades, I don’t know what people were expecting?

    • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 days ago

      For real. I played through Far Cry 5 recently, and as much as I enjoyed it it still felt like some exec saw Far Cry 3 and said “make this appeal broader and sell more.”

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        I played through FarbCry 3 and 4 and started getting into 5 recently.

        I just couldn’t.

        They got markedly worse reach time. I was able to finish 4, but the “THIS IS AN UBISOFT GAME” vibe became more and more shameless. It felt gross, it was filtered through something ugly. I never felt the love for it that Far Cry 3 earned. I still vividly remember visiting the first shop and seeing “Painted Pachyderms! Spend Uplay points to make all the elephants colorful!” It was on the front page, it was so fucking UbiSoft. It made sure I’d never see the gun stores in FC3’s successor as gun stores in any kind of immersive way.

        With FC5, it just got worse.

        I think I want to try Far Cry 2 some time, I think I used to play it a very long time ago but I barely remember it. I remember the malaria shots and the very flammable grass.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    13 days ago

    Not releasing your new game on the largest game market in the world is a bold choice as well.

  • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Maybe don’t charge $145 for a digital product. Maybe charge $50, and sell it to 5x the people. It quite literally costs nothing (okay, pedantically, the tiniest fraction) to sell more units.

    I’d play an okay Star Wars game for $50 day 1. Wouldn’t you?

    And then when it goes on sale, loads of people would pay $20 on a 60% sale price next year. Whose paying $60 at a 60% off sale for a year old okay Star Wars game? No one. Not one soul.

    Oh, you can get it cheaper for subscribing to Ubisoft+. Fuck off with that bullshit, do you even hear yourself?

  • overload@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I think that’s kind of a shame.

    I don’t care for Ubisofts bland and lazy open world design formula, but SW:O appears to not do a lot of the usual open world BS that they’re known for.

    I only get this from Skillup’s review and he had a host of problems with gameplay, but I also got the sense that this is a game that will be remembered fondly by a subset of the star wars fandom.

    Hopefully the lesson that Ubi learns isn’t “see, we should stick with what works. Another generic open world Assassins Creed RPG-Lite”.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    13 days ago

    Damn, it’s down 45% over the last year as well. They seem to have released a few flops recently; and their notable IPs kinda just aren’t exciting anymore.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        13 days ago

        They shut off the Crew 2 and even planned on deleting the game from people’s libraries. They’ve added micro transactions to (I think) every single Ubisoft game in the last decade. They were pro NFTs and wanted it rolled out to games. Their Ubisoft launcher. Toxic and sexist environment.

        Every few years, they make a better Assassins Creed or Far Cry that moves the open-world genre forward. But that’s the only positive thing I can say.

        • immutable@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          13 days ago

          Really enjoyed Farcry 5 but Farcry 6 was ok gameplay wise but the story was really underwhelming especially with the amazing talent they got in Giancarlo Esposito.

          The real problem with Ubisoft games is that they are all 95% reskins. If you’ve played one farcry game you’ve played most of every farcry game, same with assassins creed, etc.

          Now those games often end up having relatively fun mechanics so when another farcry comes out I’ll still play it because it’s a fun game to me.

          I do wonder how much they are just hitting a saturation point where the same couple games reskinned over and over are just underwhelming

    • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Wait till Assassin’s Creed Shadows flops miserably. Ubisoft is a couple of € billions in debt.

      I only hope they release Anno 117 and new HoM&M before they fail completely.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Who even invests in ubisoft? If you know anything about games you would know ubisoft is crap company and if you dont know, why would you risk your money to something you have no idea about.

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    13 days ago

    I mean it’s the first time in a long time someone other than EA got the star wars licence, and they make a bland, unexciting game. I can’t imagine Disney is very happy.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      12 days ago

      If it’s bland and unexciting then it fits very well into Disney Star Wars and Disney should be very happy about it being so on brand.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yeah, my understanding is Disney is partially at fault for a lot of these flops. I don’t think they’d make a KOTOR or Jedi Knight game.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 days ago

    You can block tainted production companies on steam, this removes all their slop from the store page and vastly improves the marketplace.

    Ubisoft was the first shit-hole prod company I ever blocked and it was glorious.

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Most everyone I’ve seen that actually played it seems to like it.

    • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      They’re using a trusted formula that has worked since Far Cry 3 from 12 years ago. It’s fun but it’s not going to turn a lot of heads. Many just wish they would try something different.

    • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      The Venn Diagram of “people still spending that much money on a game” and “people that are easy to please” seems to be a circle. Maybe something to do with a sunk-cost-fallacy coupled with the “social proof” stuff?

      But I don’t know the game. Maybe it’s okay.

    • RxBrad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      There seems to be a TikTok campaign where certain people desperately want players to hate this game. I keep seeing this same skinny wispy-bearded dude over & over shitting on the game.

      I keep seeing the videos, and what I watch just makes me say “It honestly doesn’t look bad to me.”

      • Soup@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yeah… fuck them for enjoying a game, right? The nerve of some people. Why didn’t they take your feelings into account?