• Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Save for a very brief period of time, I was always anti-Israel, but I simply was unaware of just HOW fucked up Israel was due to a variety of factors.

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Israel and its supporters did a GREAT job of linking anti-israel sentiment to antisemitism. That alone made reporting of its messed up actions and history taboo. Certainly does not help that neonazis are also frequently anti-israel.

        But… Shit… I mean Israel was founded on white jewish supremacy. Real hard to have a state founded on racial supremacy not turn into a fucking nightmare.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s ok, just think of all the 4 year old hamas terrorists they killed!

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      The talkie-talkie of the US government not matching their walkie-walkie.

      What! A! Shocker!

  • Blackout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Israel did this because they thought it would make them safer. The future generations won’t forget this. They might as well make their country an island

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I’m sorry but your point is anchored on an old Propaganda myth of Israel.

      Israel’s lack of safety comes from them having stolen Palestinian land and continuing to steal Palestinian land, for decades.

      If safety was their prime objective, they could stop stealing Palestinian land, give back at least some Palestinian land and compensate the victims for the rest (I am assuming here that Israel would keep some of the originally stolen land to continue to exist as a nation).

      They have chosen not to do that and instead they have chosen to use force against Palestinians to stop their just rage at having their land stolen and have chosen to Genocide Palestinians to finally take away the rest of their land.

      Safety is not the primary reason for the actions of Israel. Safety is an excuse and at best a second or third order reason derived from their real primary reason:

      • Israel did this (as they did most of what they did to Palestinians for 7 decades) because they want to steal all the Palestinian land.
    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      They did it because they want to genocide Palestine - this only creates a bunch of people with justifiable hatred of Israel and nothing to lose.

      If they wanted to be safer, they wouldn’t have funded Hamas’ displacement of the secular moderates, gleefully committed and publicised thousands of warcrimes, established an ethnostate, conducted decades of land grabs, or scream maniacally about a second, bigger Amalek.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      No, the didn’t do this because “they think it will make them safer” they knew exactly what they doing and that’s why there is a genocide case against them.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Without supporting any kind of violence. And without denying anything.

    I feel obligated to say that this is purposely manipulated. As pictures taken in very different times of day and year make for a faulty comparison that does not portrait reallity.

    Specially the time of day (that make shadows disappear on the right picture) and the sandy surfaces make it seems like the image on the right it’s all flat and that buildings are leveled to the ground. And that’s simply not true. It’s just optical illusions.

    This does not mean that the areas was not subjected to heavy bombardment, and that all people on that area may have been killed by bombs. But the images presented are just manipulative and I’m against media manipulation no matter how good intentions are behind the manipulative attempt.

    • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      “Now Jimmy, make sure you wait for a full year of bombing and spend a few thousand dollars adjusting the timing of this satellite to get exactly comparable images so someone on the internet who vaguely heard about manipulative photo techniques, but is fine with ignoring the realities of actually taking the photos, can’t nitpick an image of very clear destruction.”

      EDIT: And let’s just drive this home: https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2024/08/27/satellite-imagery-shows-vast-destruction-in-rafah/

      The differences between 2023 November and 2024 April are due to lighting, and it’s plain to see the buildings are still there even with lighting differences.

      Between 2024 April and August nearly everything left of the red line is gone. It’s not some trick of the light or sand - you can clearly see the other buildings right of the line.

      You’ve tried to deflect by saying people are missing the point and you agreed there is destruction - but no one said that. They said that your two points, that the destruction was not as bad as the images suggest, and that the images are intentionally misleading are both false.

      And they are both false.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The image clearly tries to make see like not a single building is left. It’s the intention of this images.

        I’m pretty sure there’s a noble intention behind this, but it is misleading, it is propagandistic.

        I will provide you a true comparison, similar lightning, similar time of the year. From september 2023 to september 2024. You’ll clearly see the destruction. It’s nothing shy. There’s a lot of destruction. But my images will not exaggerate reality.

        There you don’t have to really look into what buildings are still up or not, as it is quite evident in the images what was destroyed to the ground. Even with far worse resolution the portrayal of reality is, IMO, infinity better. And the fact that in 5 minutes, with public resources and from my phone I can create this image that is less propagandistic that the image of the post, is, again IMHO, another evidence on why the image from the post have a higher propagandistic value that informative value.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      The fact that this has as many downvotes as upvotes makes me want to avoid anything political on lemmy, and go back to just shitposting about Linux distros.