In my humble opinion, the Technology community should only contain text news/articles or even news pictures.

I simply think that tech videos does not belong to this community, as there is already a videos community which would be more suitable for this.

What does the mods think about this?

  • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    If the video is about technology. It’s okay to post them here. If you don’t like videos don’t click them simple as.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    But guys in a DeCeNtRaLiZeD social network no one is in control of what content gets posted.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s an odd request. I’m not a huge fan of video content but there’s legitimately good content in video format.

  • PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’m OK with actual honest to goodness videos on lemmy generally. It’s those fucking gifs that drive me up the fucking wall. Gifs should be banned from lemmy, they’re so heavily abused. 3 out of 4 “video” posts is actually just a 100mb+ gif. Use any fucking thing other than gifs. Fuck gifs. If I had a time machine I would go back in time just to prevent gifs from getting invented just so people would stop posting 1 minute long gifs all over lemmy. In fact, maybe I should plot and scheme to sneak the removal of gif support from the lemmy software git repo somehow the same way hackers got that ssh virus in.

    Fuck gifs and everyone that chooses to use them instead of any other format. If videos are too complicated to figure out you need to be posting a picture or maybe just go outside. Fuck.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just don’t click on YouTube links if you don’t like them. Nobody makes you forces you to. No Lemmy client I know hides the URL and surprises you with video content. Plenty of video creators use that medium to showcase differences in technologies. Digital Foundry videos on topics such as frame generation come to mind.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I really don’t like the trend of things that should be articles, being videos instead. And I’m very unlikely to watch one of these videos. However, this is a personal preference and I don’t necessarily think videos should be banned from this community. Instead upvotes/downvotes could decide that; if no one wants to see videos, no one should upvote them.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    For me, video is rarely the form that I want to consume any content in. It’s also very obnoxious if I’m on a slow data link (e.g. on a cell phone link).

    However, sometimes it’s the only form that something is available in. For major news items, you can usually get a text-form article, but that isn’t all content. I submitted a link to a YouTube video of a Michael Kofman interview the other day talking about military aid to a Ukraine community. I also typed up a transcript, but it was something like an hour and a half, and I don’t know if that’s a reasonable bar to expect people to do.

    I think that some of this isn’t that people actually want video, but that YouTube has an easy way to monetize video for content creators. I don’t think that there’s actually a good equivalent for independent creators of text, sadly-enough.

    And there are a few times that I do want video.

    Video doesn’t actually hurt me much at this point, but it would kind of be nice to have a way to filter it out for people who don’t want it. Moving all video to another community seems like overkill, though. Think it might be better to have some mechanism added to Threadiverse clients to permit content filtering rules; I think that probably a better way to meet everyone’s wants. It’d also be nice if there were some way to clearly indicate that a link is video content, so that I can tell prior to clicking on it.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    9 times out of 10 I prefer reading, but there’s some videos that are absolutely worth watching over reading. That said, I don’t really want to see talking heads. And I think people should include the channel/creator name in the title.

    But as a reality check, I’m looking at the first page of this community and only see one YouTube link. Doesn’t really seem like a problem worthy of a rule.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    as there is already a videos community which would be more suitable for this.

    So literally all videos should be posted in the videos community?

    That sounds awful.

  • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Videos are unfortunately the way a LOT of quality content is delivered now and banning any and all videos (relevant or not) is probably not the way to go.

    GN, L1T, HUB and so on are super high-quality stuff that’re tech related and that’s basically how they deliver their content. A blanket ban would kill way too much good shit, imo.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s lots of tech ology channels on YouTube and it’s competition that do tech news that I feel are pretty relevant (gamerz nexus for sure). I wouldn’t want people to lose that just because some of us (myself included) prefer written formats to videos.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Personally, I think if it’s a video related to technology, it belongs in the technology community more so than the video community.