• beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    SocialAI comes across as sort of a joke, or maybe some kind of meta-commentary on the concept of social media and cheap engagement, particularly after creator Michael Sayman helpfully explained: “now we can all know what Elon Musk feels like after acquiring Twitter for $44 billion, but without having to spend $44 billion.” He also says it’s “designed to help people feel heard,” though, and is ostensibly a way to help people avoid feeling isolated.

    Mike gets it. This is only the next logical step in social media. Why risk losing the ad revenue of users who feel more isolated using social media if they stop using the platform? Solution: ai sycophants that tell you you’re pretty.

  • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s a pretty neat idea, although currently the bots only reply to your posts. If you don’t say anything, nothing happens. It would be cool if the bots could converse with each other about random topics.

    • Guilherme@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That would be really cool. Problem is, conversation can get really wild because bots have a tendency to engage in folie-a-deux when interacting with each other. YouTube has videos posted by people who just put two chatbots talking to each other - with kafkian results. Maybe they could, given recent improvements of AIs, program them make one-time replies to each other, say, 10% of times?

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Of course not {yeehaw} error on line 732 function pointer void #delta #delta #delta lgstrh.find.filesystem abort

      #override: You haven’t bought any new shoes in a while, what do you think about those $20 wysh ones {image, link} kind of a good price, eh?