• micosil@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    In most of the Spanish speaking countries, children take the first surname of each parent, and they never change their name. You can even choose the order in which they appear, although it’s nearly always the father’s surname first. Spanish naming customs

  • Virkkunen@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Until the 1950s, by law in Hungary the wives would take the husband’s full name. Júlia Kovacs would marry András Boráros and become Andrásné Broráros. Sexist and incredibly silly in my opinion.

    Nowadays they can chose to keep their name, change it fully or change their last name. I still find a lot of women that change their names fully and it’s so confusing.

    From 2004, men can also chose to change their names on the same rules.

  • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    What if we did like Quebec instead and didn’t take anybody’s name… Remain your own person. Enough with this antiquated BS.

    • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I think the reality is it should be up to the individuals to decide whatever the hell they want to do. It’s totally fine if a woman wants to take her husbands name. And equally fine for her not to. Vice versa as well, no reason the husband can’t make that decision.

  • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Americans already have a confusing number of unisex names, so why not make all names unisex. The gender noun confusion clearly isn’t enough, so why not max out the potential confusion you can create.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Any name is already unisex, it just depends how many people it’s applied to. Look at older names like Ashley and Taylor.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Why stop there. Just keep on using all the usual names, but make them all unisex.

        For example, if Tony is texting to Anna, He will have no idea if Anna is a he or she until they meet face to face. Also, Anna might be expecting to meet a woman, but will be surprised to find that Tony is actually a guy. Then, Anna tells Tony, that they should really talk to Karen for some weight lifting tips because he’s been lifting for years.

        Sounds confusing, but you’ll actually know who is married and who is still single. Pretty handy, eh?

  • Andrew@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’d be interesting if men took on their wife’s first name, so it would immediately indicate to others if a man was married or not. And then there’d be pushback, in the same way there is to the ‘Mrs’ and ‘Miss’ titles, and parents would start naming their sons with female names to start with. (it works less well the other way around, because there’s already girls called ‘Dylan’ and ‘Taylor’, etc).

      • Andrew@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Well, yeah. Dunno how popular those names still are though. There’s also androgynous-sounding name like ‘Alex’ or 'Andy, of course, but I figured that the general idea was to take a flight of fancy and riff on it, not shoot it down from the skies.

    • whaleross@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Naww it wasn’t a question, my dude. It was a shower thought. A silly random idea that spurs some entertainment of thoughts and scenarios. But thanks! <3

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah all you’ve done is put the family name first. Which is already a thing in some parts of the world.