• Vilian@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    If we install enough solar where 100% of our daytime load is served by solar, that’s great. But what about when the solar starts to drop off later in the day?

    Store the surprus of energy from the solar panels and use that as a buffer with batteries or gravity

    But some gas units take literal hours to turn on. And if you’re 100% renewable during the day, you can’t have those gas units already online.

    Why not? Just time it and start it hours before, wind energy could help in that too

    • antimongo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gravity energy storage doesn’t scale well. I’ve replied to other comments with more detail on this.

      There are more feasible energy storage technologies out there, but these are super cutting edge and are not ready for grid-level deployment yet.

      The future of grid level energy storage is almost certainly not going to be gravity based. At least not on a large scale.

      You can’t have 100% of load be renewable/solar and have gas units online on top of that. That’s over generation. You have to match the supply exactly with the demand. If you mismatch, you destabilize the grid. Undersupply causes blackouts, oversupply melts power lines.

      If a unit takes 10 hours to start, solar hours are from 6am to 6pm, and peak load is at 7pm with 0% solar; when do you recommend we start this unit? At the minimum, we’d have to order it on at 7am. Units have to run at a minimum load, let’s say 100MW for this unit. So now you can’t 100% solar from 7am to 6pm, you have to leave 100MW of room for this base loaded unit.

      This doesn’t even factor in regulatory requirements like flex, spinning reserve, and other balancing and reliability requirements. Grids are required to have emergency units available at an instant to prevent mass destabilization if parts of the grid fail.

      • Vilian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        10hours to start oof, i though it was less, maybe individual batteries in house, like we have with water?, that wouldn’t be cheap for industry tho

        • antimongo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          To be fair 10 hours is either a pretty old or pretty massive unit. 2 hours might be a little more reflective of modern gas turbines. Especially combined cycles. But depending on how big the peak is, you need every available unit, both old and new.

          Ultimately the issue is it’s very hard to meet that peak when all of your gas units have to go from 0 to 100% output. Much easier (and more reliable) to take them from 10% to 100%. Which is what grid operators do currently.

          Yea an affordable battery in every home would be a slam dunk. This is kinda already happening with vehicle2grid (v2g) electric car protocols. But not everyone has an EV yet. And operators are still working out the kinks using this in the grid.

          Plus the lithium batteries in cars have their own supply/recycling issues.