Just started getting this now. Hopefully it’s some A/B testing that they’ll stop doing, but I’m not holding my breath

  • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I know this may come off as a surprise: but I imagine that requiring JS in 2024 isn’t a big deal to most people.

    Now of course Lemmy skews more into that small crowd.

    I don’t blame any website for requiring JS for full functionality in 2024.

    • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I agree that it’s not a big deal, but there still should be an option in my opinion. It can be a lifesaver to be able to search on older devices.

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      All of the people replying to this saying you shouldn’t need JS are totally unaware how modern web development works.

      Yes, you could do many sites without JS, but the entire workforce for web development is trained with JS frameworks. To do otherwise would slow development time down significantly, not allow for certain functionality to exist (functionality you would 100% be unhappy was missing).

      Its not a question of possibility, its a question of feasibility.

      • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        I’m a React dev. You can create server side websites, written in JS, that don’t require JS to be turned on in the browser. Granted, this just became a new official feature in React but has already been available with React frameworks like NextJS

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        My question is if it wasn’t required before and is required now, what changed? It’s not like Google has added a killer feature recently - this is almost certainly related to those shitty AI answers that are forcing your actual search results even further down the page than they were already.

        • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          It wasn’t required, but id wager 99% of website that exist currently run JS in some form or another for something.

          Id wager its impossible to have anything dynamic on a webpage without JS (minus visual dynamics which can be handled with css), at that point you have to replace it with a different programming language and every browser needs to completely change gears to allow other code to run instead. But what advantage is gained by changing to another programming language? Cleaner code w/ less jankyness? Sure I guess, but we would be moving mountains to accomplish a silly thing.

          I’m wondering if many people in this thread understand what JS is and does.

        • auzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Even things like lazy loading and such require js though

          A lot of features might not be obvious honestly

          If you’re interested though, you could check the source which should be able to tell you immediately what they use it for

      • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I wish JS would die and we get nice and simple websites back. I hate web dev so god damn much. The internet is pure enshittification

        • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I don’t know how to tell you this, but removing JS doesn’t turn the internet into a wonderland. Capitalism is to blame for enshitification not JS

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It’s far more than that. Even on a basic search page. Ever expanded the ‘Peaplo also ask’ section, for example? It loads more results based on your scroll position or interaction.
        There’s loads of little things like this, you may just not notice or care about it - which is another discussion.

          • filcuk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            12 hours ago

            That’s not up to you, or any of us.
            Not maintaining non-js version makes sense for the business, considering how few people are affected.

            All we can do is move away to something better.

    • Flipper@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      For full functionality sure. For basic functionality no. Searching on Google is basic functionality I’d say.