We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the …

  • beanlink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have been using a fork of Firefox called Floorp and so far pretty happy with it. Chrome and any variant of it has essentially a monopoly on the browser and Firefox will just follow what Google says anyway so I wouldn’t recommend native firefox. It would be nice if Safari(WebKit) was more stable and available as an alternative.

    Anyway: https://floorp.app/

  • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It blows my mind that there are major companies that are actively, and very publicly- working their asses off to undermine the interests of their own customer base. And not only are they still are enabled to exist- they’re profits are constantly growing. Which means, despite their nefarious and intrusive updates to their services…. People are eating it up!

    Nothing will change until people do the work.

    Take YouTube for example:

    They have screwed people over time and again. From their content creators, to those that enjoy watching them. Yet- those that hate it so much would seemingly never organize themselves to boycott their services on a level that will ever hurt them.

    So they continue to do it unstopped.

    Nothing changes until something changes. It isn’t ever easy, but if you want it to happen badly enough, it is always worth it.

    All it takes is for someone to stand up and take the reins!

    (I cannot be that person as I have pretty severe ADHD and will probably forget that I wrote this come later this afternoon)

    • onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well said. Also maybe you forgot you wrote the comment by the afternoon, but it reminded me that I’ve been meaning to finally research more into adhd for better managing it, so thanks!

    • JonEFive@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Hate to break it to you, but you are not Google’s customer. Don’t believe me? How much did you pay for Chrome?

      This move is in fact being made with their actual customers in mind.

  • helloworld55@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Can I just add a different perspective on this?

    My dad is really old (like early baby-boomers), and I am basically the in-family tech support when the home computer starts acting strange.

    Well, right after google rolled out this update, my dad clicked on what he thought was an online shopping link. It was actually an ad for a toolbar add-on. Queue like 6+ hours trying to uninstall that add-on and the bundled software.

    I never had to worry about that in the past with him because I had u-block origin installed. Now I need to find something else that can run quietly in the background. And probably a better antivirus.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nooooo, but MV3 is all about security!

      This is how I know this is bullshit. I was reading the article and thinking "So, let me get this straight. The ads aren’t the security risk. It’s the ad blockers!"

      Sure. Pull the other one.

    • derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Buy a Raspberry PI, install PiHole or AdGuard, change router DNS, and you are good to go. Yes, not perfect, but doesn’t rely on a browser extension that can go extinct next time the browser decides it is time for a change.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Or just do what I do. Use Firefox and only keep Chromium around for those few sites that work better in Chromium.

        • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I recently switched back to Firefox, and almost immediately ran into an issue where I couldn’t log into Dropbox. It took me far longer than I’d like to admit, to realize that Firefox as the problem. I popped into edge and logged in immediately no problem.

          I’m still gonna will with Firefox, but it’s annoying that it doesn’t work all the time.

          • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            This is part of Googles strategy. Ever since the Chromium engine took off enough and everyone else fell behind they began introducing more and more changes that merely benefits them, with less public debate or proper communication (or even adherence to common standards). Last thing I remember, aside of manifest v3, was them killing off JPEG XL as it was a competitor to webp and webm (which they control). JPEG XL was actively worked on and would’ve probably turned out better before they killed it without any previous notice.

            Given Googles dominant market position, their influence and everyone wanting to cut corners wherever possible sometimes Firefox support is just ignored.

            tl;dr It’s not Firefox’ fault. It’s Google’s sabotage.

            • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Ah I see, it sounds like I’m saying it’s Firefox fault. No I definitely agree, chromium is the largest market share, and gets the most support, and doesn’t always follow standards, so some websites will have compatibility issues if they don’t specifically focus on Firefox support.

              It’s just a sucky situation.

          • yoasif@fedia.ioOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Uhh, that doesn’t seem normal at all. Is this a default config? Any extensions in use?

            • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Fresh install of Windows 10, fresh install of Firefox, fresh install of Dropbox.

              I was trying to log into Dropbox to authenticate the app, but every time I got to the part where I had to enter my 2fa it would say it was expired. I grew concerned that I was hacked and it was changed, but trying it on my old computer it worked fine.

              Then I said fine, I had accidentally paired my Dropbox account with my Google account years ago, so I guess I’ll use that. So I logged into Google, and then clicked sign in with my Google account, and I got stuck in a loop where the page was refreshing everything few seconds.

              The page would load, it would say “signing you in with your Google account”, then it would say at the top in red letters something like “sorry, you haven’t signed in recently enough to do that, please log in”, and the entire page would refresh and start the loop over, “signing you in with your Google account” etc etc. I left it go through several cycles, it was never gonna work.

              It was about then that I guessed that Firefox might be the problem, and it was 🤷‍♂️

              The only non standard thing about my config, is that Windows is inside of a VM. That could very well be it too? But edge was also in that same VM, and it worked. I only used edge because I’m trying to keep the VM light, so I didn’t install chrome for a one off thing.

              I don’t know why I got down voted in my earlier comment, I’m not pooping on Firefox. I honestly want it to work, and am still going to use it. But the facts are facts, I literally just ran into this issue yesterday 🤷‍♂️

        • helloworld55@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          That’s what I ended up doing. It was a weird conversation though, telling him that if it seemed like some website wasn’t working, try it on chrome and it just might work

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Brave also has its own blockers built in. All of which, I’m told by this article, are still not as good as uBO.

      Whatever. Just use Firefox for your daily driver and only use Chromium when absolutely necessary.

      Or don’t. It will become obvious which browser has the better blocker.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Unluckily, yes.

      There are only 3 independent browser engines left: Firefox, Chromium and Safari. And Chromium derives from Safari, so the only true alternative is Firefox.

  • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I might try uBlock Origin Lite, then if it doesn’t work very well then maybe I’ll just use Firefox

    I guess Google are betting that only a small segment of power users will switch to Firefox, while the mass of ordinary people won’t be bothered enough to switch.

    • Khrux@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is definitely a selfish opinion but people who block adverts or torrent being a small percentage of users can be a good thing.

      If they lose even 5% of their userbase to Firefox over this decision, they’ll find a way to make grand modifications to Google search and YouTube in a manner that stops you blocking ads from alternative browsers, and while I’m happy swapping to an alternative search engine, it’ll definitely becometedious to sidestep Google’s gaze.

      But if it’s 0.1% of people who swap due to this, and Google already don’t care about the small percentage they lose to Firefox then I would rather sit under the radar and not be cracked down on.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why would anyone use that browser though? Besides all the rounds of shit it went through, the CEO seems like a nutcase. First he does anti-lgbt political donations, not just once, and has to resign from Mozilla among outrage after only 21 days as the CEO. Then he tweets uninformed shit about covid and has his staff remove criticism on reddit. Sounds like a real champ.

      • cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I mean I write Javascript, also his crestion so theres that.

        I know some gay people who love Javascript and its always funny to remind them what the original creator of Javascript did

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s addressed in the article. The brave CEO has stated they will continue to support manifest v2 as long as the needed code remains in Chromium. He made no promises what happens when it is removed, though (“I don’t write checks of unknown amount and sign them”)

  • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    When was chrome or chromium safe?

    Bloated memory hole in the last 10yrs.

    The way it goes about Sucking up resources convinced me to switch to Firefox completely long ago.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes it was performance that first got me to switch too. But now I have plenty more reasons.

  • underthesign@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Firefox needs to work on ensuring seamless compatibility with more websites, web apps and so on, because I’m personally very bored with my kids’ schools and related services sending out emails and forms with links that simply won’t open in FF but are clearly expecting Chrome or Edge where they work fine. Yes, this is on the lazy developers, but if FF want wider scale take-up outside of geeky niche groups then this is the stuff they must fix.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, unfortunately the next step will be sites rejecting “unsecure” browsers because they want the ad money.

      This is going to get worse, not better.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s pretty trivial to just use an alternate browser for the garbage sites that don’t support FF.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      What you’re talking about is webcompat and is a very complicated issue. Also I’ve talked to some Mozilla devs who gave me multiple examples of Chromium rendering something wrong, and they’d have to intentionally break Firefox to render it incorrectly too, just so the end user would get a more consistent experience. Of course these issues happen more and more when things are only tested for one browser.

      • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Maybe there could be some sort of compatibility flag in Firefox which detects non-standard pages designed for Chrome. We could call it… hmm… something like Quirks Mode?

      • Yi K@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is Chromium monopoly. At this time instead of W3C standards, Chromium itself becomes the standard.

    • fxdave@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Slack calls disabled for firefox users, but if you change the user agent to chrome it works…

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Almost like it does work on Firefox but for some reason they don’t want you using it. Honestly it’s so damn weird, why do that? Is there some incentive for them?

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I encounter this very infrequently. I think I only have 1-2 examples at work. It’s not a huge deal for me to spin up a chrome for those one or two occasions.

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Sounds interesting, care to expand?

          The only concrete one I can actually recollect is generating a quote from our quoting tool in Salesforce. I just ended up running my 100+ Salesforce windows in Chrome because it has a good feature where you can name each window so I can see which customers I’m working on in the taskbar. It’s good to have those cordoned off from my normal browsing anyway. So this one doesn’t bother me. For everything else I use Firefox.

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I used this prompt

            I want to create an electron app for linux of a third party webapp

            How would I do that?

            And chatGPT gave me a good instruction, will try that out. Apparently, you only need node, electron and the javascript like this:

            
            const { app, BrowserWindow } = require('electron')
            
            function createWindow() {
              // Create the browser window
              const win = new BrowserWindow({
                width: 800,
                height: 600,
                webPreferences: {
                  nodeIntegration: true
                }
              })
            
              // Load the third-party web app
              win.loadURL('https://www.thirdpartyapp.com')
            
              // Optionally remove the default menu
              win.setMenu(null)
            
              // Open DevTools (optional for debugging)
              // win.webContents.openDevTools()
            }
            
            // Run the createWindow function when Electron is ready
            app.whenReady().then(createWindow)
            
            // Quit when all windows are closed
            app.on('window-all-closed', () => {
              if (process.platform !== 'darwin') {
                app.quit()
              }
            })
            
            app.on('activate', () => {
              if (BrowserWindow.getAllWindows().length === 0) {
                createWindow()
              }
            })
            
            
              • Petter1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Electron is a tool to bundle a website and a interpreter for that website in an application. That works on many platforms. Official discord desktop app, for example, is an electron app, spotify as well.

    • yoasif@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Firefox can’t fix all the broken sites in the world, but they do investigate issues reported to https://webcompat.com

      You can help by reporting sites that don’t work for you.

  • geography082@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    People you can still block the shit of using DNS Adblockers . There are a some free like Mullvad DNS and Adguard.

    • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s not as effective, since it can’t block anything that’s hosted from a hostname that also serves regular content without also blocking the regular content. It also can’t trick websites into thinking that nothing is blocked and it can’t apply cosmetic rules. I use it for my devices, but in browsers I supplement it with uBlock Origin (or whatever is available in that browser).

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Honestly I’d say the Internet isn’t safe, and it’s because of Google, fuck you Google. It’s not just the wine I’ve been drinking, it’s true dammit.