• penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bro, this “king” and “queen” bullshit is fucking hilarious. It needs to fucking go away. Why the fuck would anyone be ok with some dude who’s never held a job in his life to be his/her “king”? Snow white tale isn’t real. Fuck off with this shit, man.

    • Naryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Bro, this “king” and “queen” bullshit is fucking hilarious. It needs to fucking go awa

      Sit the fuck down Trumpland

      • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        No no, they dont call them kings. They call them wealth creators and, despite worshipping them in much the same way, them ruling their offices in much the same way and literally just being a financial aristocracy, I’m told its a totally different thing.

    • twinnie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s just a ceremonial thing, they don’t have any actual power. Plus it makes money for the country. There’s not really any reason to get rid of them and King Charles is always pushing anti-climate change stuff so he’s actually using his influence to try and help.

      • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 hours ago

        They’re actually given full legal immunity to anything, meaning they’re allowed to commit crimes if they so choose (which we wouldn’t know anything about as there is no transparency concerning these types of things). There have also been cases of violent repression against unarmed dissidents who were protesting against the monarchy (mostly when the queen had died), with disproportionate punishments handed out.

        Is this really necessary, having one family be pretty much above the law and having their lifestyle be funded via public funds? Sure, there’s an argument to be made that it drives the tourism, but it’s unknown how much does the royal family contribute to it, as there’s definitely tourists who would still visit the monuments and buy merch without the family.

    • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because it makes money and is entertaining.

      Without the celebrity status and novelty there would be a lot less tourism in Britain. It’s not like people go there for the food or the weather.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Why do British people think King Charles is the reason people go to Britain to visit? Nobody gives a shit about your existing monarchy outside of your country. We go there to see castles n shit.

        • Naryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 hours ago

          ^Nobody gives a shit about your existing monarchy outside of your country

          Patently false.

          30m Americans watched Harry and Megans wedding, that’s 3x the viewership of the NBA finals