Native English speakers… I hear the order of adjectives is important, and getting this wrong is jarring to read.

I’m making a pitch to upper management about building a “modular and versatile thingamawidget”. Or is it “versatile and modular thingamawidget”?

If it doesn’t matter, I think I’ll go for the latter, as it abbreviates to something easily pronouncable without sounding like a paramilitary group or a ride sharing business.

  • DaGeek247@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    25 days ago

    To my ears, when I say them out loud, I have to pause after versatile, but not after modular. This makes versatile and modular flow worse than modular and versatile does.

    This also went away after a few repetitions, so it likely doesn’t matter all that much.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    25 days ago

    Putting the shortest word first sounds better.

    ‘Men and women’ is the usual order, as is ‘ladies and gentlemen.’

    I’d go with modular first. imho

  • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    The latter is correct.

    English has a fixed adjective order:

    Determiner

    Quantity

    Opinion

    Size

    Age

    Shape

    Color

    Origin/Material

    Qualifier

    “Versatile” is an opinion and “modular” is a qualifier.

    “The single, versatile, large, new, round, blue, local, modular thingamawidget.”

    • neidu2@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      "I present to you the next generation of thingamawidgets. The future of thingamawidging: The SVeLNeRBLoMTtm "

      I can sort out the blue aspect through cheap spray paint, but I need to do some research on making a 19" rack round…

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    To my ear, modular and versatile are so similar that I wouldn’t connect them with “and”. It’s almost redundant, like “grey and colorless”.
    Also, “versatile” without any more context is devoid of meaning.

    Hard to say without more info, but my instinct is, it would sound nicer to pitch a “modular thingamawidget” and explain its versatility in another sentence or a subordinate clause.

    • neidu2@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      There’s a lot of context that I cannot share without making it a two week course in what I do for a living, but to put it simply, both versatility and modularity are descriptors that make sense together for the intended audience, as the system can be one without the other. Plus versatile refers to the software, and modular refers to the hardware.

      • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        In that case, I think the whole question is moot. The umbrella term of thingamawidget is not both modular and versatile, but its constituent parts are individually. “The thingamawidget with versatile software and modular hardware is…” would then be the more accurate description.

        Otherwise it’s like describing a brownie as wet and bitter because the egg is wet and the raw cocoa is bitter.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    adjective order (first to last):

    • Quantity
    • Opinion
    • Size
    • Age
    • Shape
    • Color
    • Origin/Material
    • Qualifier

    ‘versatile’ is an opinion. it would go before ‘modular’

    • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      25 days ago

      Why do you consider “versatile” an opinion? It’s a genuine question, I’m a native speaker and wouldn’t have thought that, but I’m also unfamiliar with how this is typically taught.

    • neidu2@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Heh, that made me realize that the trademark of the system we’re currently using, which is abbreviated into four letters, should have the first three in the opposite order.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        It’s not uncommon to change the order for branding. It makes people notice it more – even though they’re noticing it because it “feels” incorrect, it tends to force a reader’s attention. Alternatively, it might be a non-english company.

        • neidu2@feddit.nlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          Neither. By “we” I mean my colleagues and I at work. It’s a proprietary thing we use. I cannot share the name as it’s too easily googleable and doxxable, as it’s a highly niche system.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    In this case the only rule I believe there is, is the prose. What sounds better when read out loud?

    Literally looking at Elements of Style RN now to see if maybe I just don’t remember but it doesn’t have a chapter on the use of adjectives. 🤷🏻‍♂️