• ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      100% I have no confidence in Israel’s ability to comply with international law or humanitarian norms. As a jew, I am less safe because of Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians. There is no interest in self-defense or defeating terrorists. Netanyahu wants to prolong the war to stay out of prison and to create a greater Israel. Israel attacking the UN troops has really ticked me off too.

  • Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Sounds like they hit some missile manufacturing facilities. Hopefully they also hit some drone facilities.
    Less missiles and drones for Russia’s attacks on Ukraine and for the Iranian militias’ attacks on the Kurds in Syria and Iraq.

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I hope that both countries now are aware of the damage they could cause to each other. Israel can overwhelm Irans air-defense with their stealth bombers. Iran can overwhelm Israels missile defense with barrages of ballistic missiles.

    Even before the nuclear escalation level they both can inflict very serious damage to each other and their respective defense systems are not able to prevent attacks, only mitigate some of it.

    I am looking forward to the price calculations for this one. For the Iranian missile attack 01. October iirc. the damage was considered to be in the range of $ 50 Mio. With the Iranian missiles supposedly costing around $ 100k each, that would be about $ 20 Mio. For the attack i couldn’t find Israels interceptions costs. For the April attack it was sought to be around $ 550 Mio. So i would expect the October interception to have cost at least similarly. $ 600/20 Mio. is a 30 to 1 ratio.

    Sending F-35s long ways is expensive, but with the more precise strikes that could have inflicted substantial damage at key points.

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    How many military orphanages, military preschools and military press tents are they planning to strike this time? Are military supermarkets, military food banks and military temples also on the target list, or not this time?

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Very valid concerns but it seems their response was limited to military targets. Which makes sense; I don’t think they wanna genocide Iran so targeting civilians would be meaningless.

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      It looks like the response was limited this time. That’s not to say that there won’t be a next time where they go overboard.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-826117

    Five explosions were reported heard across Tehran and the nearby city of Karaj early on Saturday morning, according to Iranian media, in what is alleged to be the beginning of an Israeli retaliatory attack on Iran.

    A second wave of airstrikes was reported following blasts heard in Shiraz later on early Saturday morning.

    I don’t immediately know what the significance of those locations are, and there’s probably more-detailed information coming shortly, but I imagine that that alone is probably enough to give people who have been looking at the matter an idea of what likely targets were.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      So, couple guesses on my part, prior to information coming in:

      • If the attack is over – which I don’t know, but I don’t think that there’d be a reason to have it run over an extended period of time – and if these reports as to explosions are accurate, it is probably far smaller than the Iranian attack to which it was a response. That attack included 200 ballistic missiles. On the other hand, if – and we don’t know this yet, though I’m sure it’ll be in the news shortly – Israel actually hit IRGC headquarters, they probably caused more damage and killed more people than the Iranian strike; the missile fired at Mossad’s headquarters was inaccurate and hit an area by a nearby road, as I recall, and a number of the missiles were intercepted.

      • If Israel is aiming to mirror the Iranian attack in particulars, not just targets, the Iranian attack included two waves. I don’t know why Israel would do that unless it had something to do with intended damage by Iran, but thought it’d be worth a mention, since knowing when the Israeli attack is complete would be interesting information.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Did 200 missiles hit their targets though? Israel has F35’s that can basically guarantee to hit any target they like, Iran has to assume 90% of their missiles will be intercepted.