“Translation: all the times Tesla has vowed that all of its vehicles would soon be capable of fully driving themselves may have been a convenient act of salesmanship that ultimately turned out not to be true.”

Another way to say that, is Tesla scammed all of their customers, since you know, everyone saw this coming…

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The thing with (full) self-driving is that the edge cases are the challenge. Driving is the Pareto Principle really cranked up: (fully made up numbers) 2% of the driving represents 90% of the difficulty. And highway driving is a much simpler task to be automated than driving on a stroad, weird intersections, unprotected turns, etc.

    I think we are a long ways off from full self-driving, and highway driving capabilities of current vehicles only address what is by far the easiest scenario. And even there those capabilities are limited from what I’ve seen.

  • Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I believe that some technological ideas can work. The problem is that ideas that are under people like Musk, are doomed to always fail and will be seen as negative.

    Elon Musk sucks.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem is that ideas that are under people like musk, are doomed to always fail

      Like electric cars, like reusable rockets…

      • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep Elon famously invented the first electric car and the first reusable spacecraft. He did it in his garage with his own two hands!

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Read your damn history.

          SpaceX is basically 100% Elon’s creation. He was founder, Tom Mueller (who designed the Merlin rocket engine) was the first employee period

          Tesla was Elon and a few other people who had seen a good electric roadster, but it had been a one-off that that company was not going to produce. They decided they wanted to produce an electric roadster, so they did. Initially, Martin Eberhard was in charge of the company and Elon was just an investor. Search archive.org for the original Tesla blog. It’s all laid out. I know this because I was following them while it was happening.

          Eberhard was in charge, and they were going for a setup with a two-speed gearbox. There was to be no clutch, just a synchromesh to allow shifting. Problem is, shifting at 10,000+ RPM under heavy load is mechanically stressful, and they were having a lot of trouble getting the gearbox to work reliably. After a good year of screwing with this, they were burning through cash and not getting close to actually shipping a car. That’s when Elon stepped in, pushed Eberhard out, and took over Tesla. Elon quickly switched to a setup with a single speed non-shifting gearbox (much easier to build, much less expensive, and will basically last forever as long as you lubricate it) and a larger and better cooled electric motor to deliver the required torque that they wouldn’t get from a lower speed gear. That setup is still in use today in all Teslas.

            • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m not saying he’s not an asshole. But he is a visionary.

              And right now, if he wasn’t up Trump’s ass, you’d probably be saying he’s a visionary without sarcasm.

                • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Okay Trump is recent, but his whole change of focus since buying Twitter is where public opinion on him shifted. That started a shift in public statement more toward the libertarian or perhaps conservative and that made him unpopular with a lot of the liberals who previously liked him for pushing environmental causes.

                  Now that he pushes conservative and libertarian ideals, supports a Republican candidate, he becomes persona non grata. That may well be valid, but it should not take away recognition of his other accomplishments. If he’s now an asshole, he can be a visionary asshole. Becoming an asshole doesn’t mean he isn’t or wasn’t a visionary.

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    My Leaf can handle itself on the highway and it’s the perfect amount of self driving that I want. I also didn’t need to pay half the price of the leaf for the privilege.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I personally don’t think it’s a matter of more sensory input. Whilst Lidar wouldn’t be a bad thing, autonomous cars are just a problem current technology can’t solve.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The vehicles with a higher automated driving rating than Tesla use a more diverse range of sensory inputs. While it may not make fully autonomous driving, it very clearly would have made Tesla closer to it based on the fact that cars that use things like lidar in addition to cameras surpassed Tesla’s rating many years ago.

        • endofline@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think there needs be car 2 car ( or even car 2 human f.e. in smartphones and wearables ) introduced before self driving cars is capable to exist. Of course until real AI is introduced. We’re nowhere near the human capable ai

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        We already have road legal level 4 self driving cars for sale in Germany (Mercedes EQS and S Class), level 5 isnt far away.

        If Tesla didn’t go the vision-only route they would probably also have level 4 autonomy by now

    • aaron@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Elon Musks make engineering orders of magnitude more difficult. Those poor Tesla neoslaves

      • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m happily using all the sensors my car offers, even if I’m pretty ok with driving by eyesight. Better sensors that can easily see through fog/rain/snow/whatever? Hell yeah, give them to me.

        • Gawdl3y@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          LiDAR in particular actually kinda sucks at those conditions (basically any form of precipitation). It’s really only good in clear environments.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This smacks of the hyperloop, a false product offered to suppress support of other competing products.

    Id est, a high-capital entity using their power to suppress competiton for smaller (more sincere) interests.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I realized self-driving on roads is impossible for so-called when someone pointed out what human drivers do when there’s like a flock of geese camped out in the middle of the road.

    We know that we should slowly move forward until they get out of the way, including bonking then with the car (gently). Do we want cars deciding that some obstruction in the road is “ok” to hit? I don’t. So what’s the solution? Something other than pure autonomous self driving.

    We can probably have some very high level driver assist. Maybe.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      All the issues with self-driving could be solved if they actually gave a shit about making it work. You don’t let the machine choose. You give it hard fucking rules to follow. It doesn’t need to identify geese, human, ball, dog, child to react differently to each; it should see an obstruction and stop to avoid damaging the fucking object and car, regardless of what it is. They are making it way more complicated than it really has to be.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Billionaires also fall into the Gartner hype cycle. And convincing a billionaire there’s an opportunity to automate workers out of a job is a quick way to get an injection of cash.

      It’s going to be generations before we are actually able to automate most labor. But long, long before that AI will be capable enough to replace overpaid CEO’s.