• interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    How does the EU not have its own link engine? EU being pathethic not just IP nulling all of silicon valley and their garbage products from the continent.

  • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The EU already doesn’t like what google and the like are doing, maybe this gives them proper ammo

    • ProtonFiber@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      What a good timing, honestly. In recent news of Nov 11th, Ecosia and Qwant, two European search engines, join forces on an index to shrink reliance on Big Tech (TechCrunch news article):

      Qwant, France’s privacy-focused search engine, and Ecosia, a Berlin-based not-for-profit search engine that uses ad revenue to fund tree planting and other climate-focused initiatives, are joining forces on a joint venture to develop their own European search index.

      The pair hopes this move will help drive innovation in their respective search engines — including and especially around generative AI — as well as reducing dependence on search indexes provided by tech giants Microsoft (Bing) and Google. Both currently rely on Bing’s search APIs while Ecosia also uses Google’s search results.

      Maybe it’s time for Europeans to support more European tech companies and leave USA-based tech companies behind, here is a good start: https://european-alternatives.eu/

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Somebody help get my ideas straight on this one, please.

    To my knowledge, Bing and Google search engine are the default options available out there, to the point other search services relay service from those, give or take a few tweaks (DuckDuckGo, Startpage, etc).

    Now lets remove those from the picture and what is left?

    I read a post yesterday announcing Ecosia amd Qwant were joining efforts to build a fully european search engine (hopefully, yes, but I’m not holding my breath on it). Maybe that is an option. But what else?

  • Routhinator@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Users are testing the impact of not using Google.

    Spoiler: non-LLM enshittified search engines return reliable results and usually are not censored.

  • jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Big tech needs to be stopped yesterday. This literally has china great firewall energy and I hate it.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is the opposite of what you think it is.

      Google says it’s running the “time-limited” test because EU regulators and publishers “have asked for additional data about the effect of news content in Search.” The company says it will continue to show results from websites and news publishers located outside the EU, and it will resume showing results from EU news publishers once the test ends.

      This is the EU testing what it would be like if they ditched Google, not Google testing what it would be like without the EU. The test also doesn’t impact the US.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Europe asked Google to do this so they can monitor what kind of influence Google has.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Big tech needs to be stopped yesterday. This literally has china great firewall energy and I hate it.

      This is one of the rare occasions I’m siding with Google. The news outlets are claiming that they should be paid money for those result snippets. It’s not because I’m caring for Google so much but because that stance hurts small search engines.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Laws need to be different for monopolies and large player. Stop the rich from using the small as human shield for their grotesqie practice.

      • Lennny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not wanting to appear on Google is how we’re going to get EVEN more dailymail type shit.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean, they’ve done this when places charge them money to index the news articles there.

      It hardly seems reasonable to both mandate that they index a given piece of news media and that they pay a fee to do so.