Throughout my life, I’ve always heard people refer to the early 21st century years as “two thousand and X”. For example, they pronounced 2001 as “two thousand and one”. In my experience, during the mid-2010s there seemed to be a shift in the way people said it, and the first time I heard someone say it differently was in 2016, where they pronounced it as “twenty sixteen”.

Most people I’ve heard pronounced the late-2010s years as “two thousand and X”, although the pronunciation “twenty X” had started to catch on fast. By the year 2020, almost nobody used the “two thousand and X” pronunciation, except for very old people I knew. For example, most people would pronounce 2024 as “twenty twenty-four” and not “two thousand and twenty-four”.

My question is: what year is the cutoff date for pronouncing the early 21st century years as “two thousand and X?” I’ve always heard people say it that way prior to 2016, I’ve never heard someone pronounce, say, 2007 as “twenty oh seven”.

I hope I was able to properly articulate what I’m trying to say.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I always say
    “two thousand”
    “Oh one, oh two, oh three…”
    “Twenty ten, twenty eleven…”

  • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    For me it was

    2000: Two thousand

    2001: Two thousand one (or less formally “oh one”)

    2009: Two thousand nine (“oh nine”)

    2010: Twenty ten

    And from there on. I think this is because of the amount of syllables. That’s why we switch to “twenty” instead of “two thousand”.

    • Soapbox1858@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I personally say “o one” “o two” etc. all the way up to “o nine” After that it just seems weird to say “ten” or “eleven” instead of “twenty ten”

      Even referring to 1910 as “ten” seems weird and wrong, though. In my mind, it doesn’t make sense to leave the nineteen off until the 40s. For example, saying: “Back in forty-five” sounds right, but “Back in thirty-five” sounds wrong to me for some reason.

  • woop_woop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    2010, simply because of how english works.

    If you say 2001 as twenty one, it’s confusing. Same goes all the way up to “twenty nine”.

    And it’s more garbled and slower to say “twenty oh one” vs “two thousand one”, especially if you’re speaking quickly.

    “Twenty ten” and up, however, starts making sense as a different piece of information and can be used easily.

    • criitz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I agree,

      2009 and before have to be “two thousand and” style

      2013 and after have to be “twenty-” style

      The years between can be either, but I’d lean toward using “twenty-” style for those too.

      • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        How do you say 1901 then? One thousand nine hundred and one? Nineteen hundred and one? Or nineteen oh one? Have you ever heard of the Eighteen Hundred and Twelve Overture?

        I’m in the “twenty oh one” etc camp, it’s concise and consistent.

        • criitz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nineteen oh one

          But “two thousand and one” is different since it’s a millienium. I would also say “one thousand and one”, not “ten oh one”

  • pagenotfound@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I also started using the new nomenclature after 2009. It also coincided to when I finished school so it kinda fit the change in lifestyle.