• lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    asking questions like this is how i found out that one of the allowed characters in names in my country is ÿ, which is fine in Latin-1 but in 7-bit ASCII is DEL.

  • There are a frightening number of systems that don’t allow “-”, which isn’t even an edge case. A lot of people - mostly women - hyphenate their last names on marriage, rather than throw their old name away. My wife did. She legally changed her name when she came of age, and when we met and married years later she said, “I paid for money for my name; I’m not letting it go.” (Note: I wasn’t pressuring her to take my name.) So she hyphenated it, and has come to regret the decision. She says she should have switched, or not, but the hyphen causes problems everywhere. It’s not a legal character in a lot of systems, including some government systems.

    • Affidavit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 month ago

      It boggles my mind how so many websites and platforms incorrectly say my e-mail address is ‘invalid’ because it has an apostrophe in it.

      No. It is NOT invalid. I have been receiving e-mails for years. You just have a shitty developer.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        worst thing is, the regex to check email has been available for decades and it’s fine with apostrophies

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, and remember: If in doubt, send them an e-mail. You probably want to do that anyways to ensure they have access to that mailbox.

          You can try to use a regex as a basic sanity check, so they’ve not accidentally typed a completely different info into there, but the e-mail standard allows so many wild mail addresses, that your basic sanity check might as well be whether they’ve typed an @ into there.

            • Ephera@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yeah, I’m just saying that the benefit of using such a regex isn’t massive (unless you’re building a service which can’t send a mail).

              a@b is a syntactically correct e-mail address. Most combinations of letters, an @-symbol and more letters will be syntactically correct, which is what most typos will look like. The regex will only catch fringe cases, such as a user accidentally hitting the spacebar.

              And then, personally, I don’t feel like it’s worth pulling in one of those massive regexes (+ possibly a regex library) for most use-cases.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          There are many regexes that validate email, and they usually aren’t compliant with the RFC, there are some details in the very old answer on SO. So, better not validate and just send a confirmation, than restrict and lock people out, imo

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The article you just mentioned in the comments includes both a completely reasonable and viable regex and binary and library alternatives that are in most languages.

            • lad@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Reasonable and viable ≠ RFC compliant

              This quote summarises my views:

              There is some danger that common usage and widespread sloppy coding will establish a de facto standard for e-mail addresses that is more restrictive than the recorded formal standard.

    • troybot [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      And you’d think a simple solution is just leave out the hyphen when you put you name in, but that can also lead to problems when the system is looking for a 100% perfect match.

      And good luck if they need to scan the barcode on your ID.

      • Then the first part is interpreted (in the US, anyway) as a middle name, not as part of the last name. I did run into a recently married woman who did that: dropped her middle name, moved her last to the middle, and used her spouse’s last name.

        More commonly, places that don’t take hyphens tend to just run the two names together: Axel-Smith becomes AxelSmith.

        Programmers can be really dumb.

    • r4venw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have come across a shockingly large amount of people who not only have a hyphenated last name but also have a hypenated first name! Dealing with every new computer system is like a new adventure

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are also fringe externalities from this too. I have my mom’s last name for my middle name and my dad’s for my last name. But back in the 90s, my state would erroneously handle that scenario as having no middle name and both names hyphenated for a last name. I didn’t find this out until I turned 18 and tried to get a retail job and they wouldn’t hire me until it got fixed.

      First I had to go to the Dept of Health and get a new birth certificate, then I had to do the same at the social security administration for a new social security card. Hours and hours over multiple days just so I could earn minimum wage folding and selling used clothing. Ironically, the name mixup never was a problem when I did taxes previously.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    If elected president my first order of business will be to make all birth certificates fully unicode compatible.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not legal in Sweden. Our “IRS” must also accept the name and deem it legal.

    I for one like this. As it stops some very stupid people to name their children some very stupid names. Such as “Adolf Hitler”.

    And yes. Someone did try to name their child this and they were appropriately stoped from doing it.

    • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Probably have to escape it so it will work properly: John\/nDoe

        • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Sure, but if you don’t escape the \ then you likely won’t even be able to get the name into the first system. You need the name to contain \n so that it gets passed correctly to other systems, otherwise his name may wind up just being “John” .