I got a copy of the text from the email, and added it below, with personal information and link trackers removed.

Hello [receiver’s name],

I’ve long dreamed about working for Mozilla. I learned how to send encrypted e-mail using Mozilla Thunderbird, and I’ve been a Firefox user since almost as long as I can remember. In more recent years, I’ve been an avid follower of Mozilla’s advocacy work, and was lucky enough to partner with Mozilla on investigative journalism in my last job.

In many ways, Mozilla was the dream – and now, as the leader of the Foundation, my job is to make my dreams for Mozilla come true. What that means, though, is making your dreams come true – for a trustworthy and open future of technology; for tech that is a tool for liberation, not limitation; and for tech that values people over profit.

So I’m reaching out to technologists, activists, researchers, engineers, policy experts, and, most importantly, to you – the people who make up the Mozilla community – to ask a simple question.

[receiver’s name]. What is your dream for Mozilla? I invite you to take a moment to share your thoughts by completing this brief survey.

Let’s start with this question:

Question 1: What is most important to you right now about technology and the internet?

  • Protecting my privacy online
  • Avoiding scams
  • Choosing products, apps, technology, and services that I can trust
  • Keeping children safe online
  • Responsible use of AI
  • Keeping the internet is open and free
  • Knowing how to spot misinformation
  • Other (please specify)

Take the survey now →

With your help, together we can imagine and create the Internet we want. Thank you for being a part of this.

Always yours,

Nabiha Syed Executive Director Mozilla Foundation

  • Mora@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Besides the already sketchy AI thing, I wonder why they need to know gender & ethnicity.

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I filled it, but there’s no avenue there to express my complete disdain for AI and how shit it can make a product. Just make everything AI optional, don’t make me download data for shit I’ll never use.

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    good set of questions while trying to be non biased on certain topics.

    for me, topics about privacy and misinformation matter more than ai. i would like them to lean more on helping me identify ai generated text and deepfakes as far as ai is concerned.

    i also liked that mozilla study about smart cars so more of that is nice.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Prolong your browser for as long as necessary and explore the possibility of using the internet without any web browsers. Firefox is a last stand of competition, and without choice there might as well not be browsers at all.

    Is it wise to have such a complex everything-app with no end in sight? (more like, no end in site)

  • Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    “To disappear”

    EDIT: I don’t care if you don’t agree and I’m not going to reply further. If you still did not came to the conclusion that Mozilla became just a cash grab machine by yourself, then you’re hopeless.

    • TheBlackLounge@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Take a minute to learn the difference between mozilla.org and mozilla.com. They are very much separate, and the .com has never pretended to not be there for the money. It’s explicitly why it exists, so that the org can keep doing its thing.

    • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      What’s the alternative, an even bigger cash grab machine like Google’s chromium?

  • Dotcom@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Shame their AI question didn’t have a “my biggest concerns is companies chasing the AI buzzword with no tangible benefit”

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      right? mozilla, you gotta focus on making a good web browser right now. not a more gimmicky web browser

  • Retiring@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The audacity to direct you to a donations page after you fill out their survey 😂

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    They seem to have a foregone conclusion that AI is a positive thing, rather than something that should be eradicated like smallpox or syphilis.

    • srecko@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s because it is a positive thing. Just because awful businesses hijacked and abused it doesn’t mean it’s all bad. Mozilla is approaching it in a positive way imo.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        And what, exactly, is positive about it, that has no associated negative outcomes?

        • Otter@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Specific to generative AI, I think client side generation can be a good thing, such as sentiment analysis or better word suggestions/autocomplete.

          A number of other helpful tasks have negative outcomes, but if someone is going to use it, then I prefer they use the version of the tech that minimizes those negative outcomes. Whether Mozilla should be focussing on building that is a different matter though

          AI that isn’t generative AI has a lot of positive uses, but usually that’s not what these discussions are about

    • TheBlackLounge@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      “Responsible use of AI” could mean things like providing small offline models for client-side translation. They’re actually building that feature and the preview is already amazing.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        IMO, there’s no such thing as responsible AI use. All of the uses so far are bad, and I can’t see any that would work as well as a trained human. Even worse, there’s zero accountability; when an AI makes a mistake and gets people killed, no executives or programmers will ever face any criminal charges because the blame will be too diffuse.

        • Patch@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          All of the uses so far are bad, and I can’t see any that would work as well as a trained human.

          I’m no AI enthusiast, but this is clear hyperbole. Of course there are uses for it; it’s not magic, it’s just technology. You’ll have been using some of them for years before the AI fad came along and started labelling everything.

          Translation services are a good example. Google Translate and Bing Translate have both been using machine learning neural networks as their core technology for a decade and more. There’s no other way of doing it that produces anything close to as good a result. And yes, paying a human translator might get you good results too, but realistically that’s not a competitive option for the vast majority of uses (nobody is paying a translator to read restaurant menus or train station signage to them).

          This whole AI assistant fad can do one as far as I’m concerned, but the technologies behind the fad are here to stay.