• Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah, but they’re great at discharging the righteous indignation of people who might otherwise do something extreme like going on demonstrations or start campaigning for non-“moderate” political parties.

      This way people just put their personal data next to a meaningless and powerless piece of text on a website alongside that of other people, get the feeling of release after having done something about what pisses them of, and won’t do anything further about it.

      Petitions are the single greatest invention of the Internet Age to keep the masses dormant (Social Media would’ve been it if, it wasn’t that, as the far-right has shown, it can be used to turn some people into activists).

  • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Here quite a few of the popular social media are banned. They’re still popular but now every schoolkid, housewife and grandpa knows what a VPN is. Every time I hear such news, I am afraid of crackdowns on censorship evasion in those places too…

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Does the article say anything about censorship? Usually bans like this are financial. So X offices would close in the EU and bank accounts seized and they wouldn’t be allowed to conduct business (eg with advertisers) in the EEA

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s just my association with the word “ban” - blocking, because that’s what I usually experienced.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah that’s not how laws usually work. Most legislation can’t censor (except some very oppressive countries), so ban usually means financial

  • index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    European politicians use X and its an assets for their governments. I doubt they are going to do much about it.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Corporate nationalist social media like “X” (American oligarchy) and TikTok (Chinese oligarchy) are a danger to the sovereignty and stability of the Western world.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Site doesn’t load. I trust they’re talking about banning it financially, not with a firewall, right?

  • rob100@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    They didn’t ban it already? DOn’t they have a filter list and they tell isps to block certain sites?

          • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s like waving a disapproving finger at a brick wall, has always been my criticism.

            Protests shouldn’t be so easily tossed in a bin. If you aren’t a problem, then no one has to listen to your message.

            • x00z@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Petitions in Europe are required to be discussed when they reach a certain threshold. The platform does not matter.

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It kind of invalidates what the EU Committee is all about. This is just stupid, and calling for a ban in a free world is more concerning than X.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s absolutely no sensible reason to even consider doing this.

  • lemmus@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ew, that sounds bad. I would prefer “promote open twitter-like social media” instead of “ban X” (you can replace X with any other website/software, even FOSS one). No banning should be allowed in EU.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They should pass a resolution that all EU member nations shall create official Mastodon and Lemmy instances. Moderators and admins would be actual jobs constrained by the relevant national or EU law.

      (Or replace Mastodon and Lemmy with whatever open platforms you deem appropriate)

    • 46_and_2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, keep X on and pile up the multi-million fines if they don’t comply with laws. That’s the only thing companies care about - something eating up their profits.

      And if they keep not complying - then ban it altogether, like Brazil did. I prefer to recognize and ban it for the illegal activities it does, not because some folks don’t like it and banded together against it.