• Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m always leary of claims like this as often planting numbers overshadow future community composition.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      As I understand it, they have to over plant as many of the trees won’t survive to maturity.

      If they plant a billion and only a hundred million are still there in fifty years it’s still a big win for the environment.

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, this is part of it, too. Usually a safe bet is a 20% contingency for planting, but you need to watch your mortality rates, obviously, as big weather events can throw that all out the window.