• Comment105@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Oh, it’s a threat from the left. I was more worried about one from the right.

    What the left says can be completely ignored right now.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yes, moderate all of that shit off every mass social media system steam, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, blue sky, tiktok, YouTube, etc. Debate and compromise on a common set of standards, one for kids spaces and another for adults, and enforce the same rules to everyone with penalties tied to annual revenues so they can’t report one set of numbers to shareholders and another when it comes time to pay for the damages they caused by ignoring regulations. That is what regulating and building new markets should look like when you don’t have a corrupt oligarchy filled with bribery and regulatory capture.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    What comes to my mind is Battlefront 2, which is sold by Steam. I think I paid $5 for it since I boycotted it back when it first came out to due to loot crates… anyway, I regularly see the n-word used in this game every. single. night. It’s used specifically to denigrate people of color, in violent and extremely racist ways.

    I don’t understand how players with maxed out accounts are able to keep them when they are saying this stuff. How is that not flagged for immediate review? EA is a trash company, and Steam may want to stop selling their games if they can’t do the BARE MINIMUM to combat this sort of behavior.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Hitler My Friend is a 99 cent game on Steam with an 8/10 positive rating.

    A 3D shooter that will change your ideas about alternative history! In this game you will climb into the boots of the unforeseen Adolf Hitler.

    There’s more, but I’m not sifting through more dog shit. This is a good thing.

  • Taokan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    NGL, when I first saw Warner making a public fuss over this, I had a bit of a reaction. Like, no one comes after my boy steam, I like my games and I like my platform. And maybe it’s because I don’t engage in many public multiplayer games these days, but I just haven’t really come across this extremist content frequently enough to feel Congress needs to get involved.

    But…

    I can see from the comments, my anecdotal experiences aren’t the whole picture. And I do get that sometimes in an otherwise free market, regulation is necessary to prevent a situation where a company does the right thing and then suffers financially from the backlash/boycott that ensues. Better to let the government be the ones to take the heat by those that get upset by the moderation.

    But I also kind of agree with the sentiment, Congress needs to clean up its own hate speech and ethics, before further legislating what everyone else should be doing.

  • Outhouse_dayz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So what gaming platform is Gabe Neweel and His friends part of. Cause this is not about valve. And obviously about making room for a competitor.

  • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Where? Where at tho? I’ve been using steam and playing valve games for like 16 years or something like that and I don’t see it anywhere. Maybe the one troll in user made guides but that usually goes away just like any other platform

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Short version is that for the most part forum moderation for each game is left up to the devs or whoever they appoint, and users can create user groups and curators without much if any restrictions and they don’t particularly give a shit what content the game you want to sell has. The only real exceptions are if it’s illegal in the US, which applies to very little (for example no CSAM).

      I find it interesting that the federal government threatening a private entity with legal repercussions if it doesn’t restrict the speech of it’s users isn’t such an obvious violation of the first amendment that lawyers aren’t climbing over each other to fight this one.

      And if you don’t see the problem with it, imagine we agree that the federal government should be allowed to restrict what expression can go on on internet platforms content-wise, then imagine Trump and his cronies deciding where the borders lie. They already want to revive the Comstock Act.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          The Comstock Act was created by a right wing Christian puritan, and has been fought against by leftists, and supported by conservatives, throughout it’s history. But commies are to blame, sure.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Once again, a clueless boomer blames games.

    How about YouTube? Why aren’t we going after Google?

    What about Twitter? Musk’s platform is filled with extremist hate.

    Plenty of extremist diarrhea spewing from the mouth of a President Elect.

    It’s almost like this kind of content on Steam is a symptom of a bigger problem.

    • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Steam honestly has it really bad. You don’t see blatant hate speech in play store reviews but you certainly do on steam. The same goes for their forums, which are almost totally unmoderated. Totally agree tho that this is a symptom of a larger problem and am always wary of the government seeking to impede free speech, even if it’s speech I despise. If there are calls to violence and stuff I’m totally cool with that being prosecuted ofc.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, agreed, it definitely needs moderation. But I don’t think it needs singling out (again, not saying don’t moderate).

        The bigger picture is a proliferation of online extremist speech in general. And yes, Google may have done well to moderate play store reviews (anecdotally), but they certainly haven’t done well with YouTube.

        But I would suggest that focusing on any one online forum / store / outlet / etc. will naturally miss an important trend, and the reasons for that trend should be understood – while concurrently doing everything possible to limit this kind of hate online.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I was going to add, as a user of both Steam and YouTube, I have seen far worse stuff in YouTube comments than I ever have on a Steam forum.

          I think part of this comes down to the fact that disgusting, hateful comments will pop up on almost any YouTube video in the comment section, but you actually have to navigate to Steam forums with this content.

          So, YouTube comments are thrown in your face and hard to not see, as they are right below the video, but Steam forum comments are at least hidden behind a few layers of clicks.

          I agree that singling out Steam as if it’s the main problem, isn’t going to fix anything, at all.

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Absolutely those platforms are a bigger problem, but your argument isn’t a very good one. Yes, we should go after those platforms. Yes, we should also go after Steam. Whataboutism never solved any problems.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I think you missed the first sentence of my comment. Games have been blamed above other media for years and years and years. That is not whataboutism.

        Edit: or the last sentence for that matter.

        It’s almost like this kind of content on Steam is a symptom of a bigger problem.

        I never suggested that Steam doesn’t need improvement. There is extremist content being posted. But it is definitely part of a larger (frankly, much more obvious) problem. Calling attention to a root cause is just not whataboutism.

        • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          From another article talking about this:

          For years, Sen. Warner, a former tech entrepreneur, has been raising the alarm about rise of hate-fueled content proliferating online, as well as the threat posed by domestic and foreign bad actors circulating disinformation. Recently, he pressed directly for action from Discord, another video game-based social networking site that is hosting violent predatory groups that coerce minors into self-harm and suicide. He has also called attention to the rise of pro-eating disorder content on AI platforms. A leader in the tech space, Sen. Warner has also lead the charge for broad Section 230 reform to allow social media companies to be held accountable for enabling cyber-stalking, harassment, and discrimination on their platforms.

          The linked Section 230 Reform details

          He’s targeting all kinds of social media, not just gaming platforms.

        • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          You literally said “what about” in your comment. You specifically argued that the problem lay elsewhere, and Steam is just a symptom. Attempting to absolve Steam of culpability in the problem because “games get blamed above other media” is absolutely whataboutism. It’s a bad argument.

          • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            You literally said “what about” in your comment.

            Do you legitimately think that any use of the words “what about” makes something whataboutism?

            You specifically argued that the problem lay elsewhere

            Again, you seem to have missed the point of the comment. I did not deny that Steam needs improvement. Things can be symptoms of larger problems, and calling that out is not whataboutism (to the contrary, the purpose of whataboutism is to suggest that there is no problem with item X – not that item X is a symptom of item Y).

            Edit: clarity

            • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              Do you legitimately think that any use of the words “what about” makes something whataboutism?

              No, that’s not what makes it whataboutism. That’s just a funny bit of your comment. What makes it whataboutism is your continued insistence that the problematic behavior is sourced from elsewhere. That’s not how things work. The right-wing extremism on Steam isn’t a symptom of extremism elsewhere. It isn’t sourced from elsewhere. It’s there on Steam, because the source for it is the same on Steam as it is on Twitter, right-wing extremist users. Suggesting that it is derived from the other sites implies that Valve is less responsible for it than other sites, which doesn’t make any sense. Furthermore, your argument in your comment is based on your perception of victimhood of video games by other media, which isn’t relevant to the conversation at all.

              And finally, the fact that Steam supposedly has, by your estimation and without any supporting evidence, less right-wing extremism than other sites doesn’t make the problem better or worse for Valve. It’s still a problem, and it’s one they have to deal with. Not twitter, not Facebook, and not anyone else.

              • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                your continued insistence that the problematic behavior is sourced from elsewhere

                So you’re suggesting that Steam is the source of the extremist behavior we see across a broad spectrum of other media?

                For someone literally arguing about argumentation, it sure is hard to see your point.

                • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  No, you just don’t seem to be understanding what I’m saying, or the point of the article linked. The source is the users, of course. What I’m saying is that they didn’t come from twitter. They’ve always been on Steam, just as they’ve always been on twitter or facebook.

                  And so, it logically follows that if you blame twitter for not dealing with users like that, then you must, by necessity, blame Valve for not dealing with them either.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, people say mean things on the internet. That’s never going away. Teach your children how to deal with it.

    • Blazingtransfem98@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think that Nazi shit or promotion of terrorism falls under “mean things on the internet” that would be over-trivializing, and I do say that because I have indeed seen many people doing these things in my years on Steam, as well as encouraging violence towards me for being a girl and having “used to have been a boy” (being transgender).

  • A_Filthy_Weeaboo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I know the article addresses it but… What about X’ter? Head of Twatter now has an official government position while his shitty company allows Neo Nazi, hate, homophobic, and misogynist behavior runs rampant!

    What a fucking farce…

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Both

      Edit: I didn’t know this community is so reactive, someone replied how is it controversial? Simply glancing through the article, anyone would know it’s talking about the comments and forums pasting swastikas and other extremist shit. This isn’t normal in other social media.