• uranibaba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wish I could use Linux at work but the software used does not have any alternative (that I can use) and I can’t be bothered with debloating and all that jazz. I try to keep work and private seperate instead.

    • C126@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      My work has a process for requesting software. Over the last five years, I’ve been slowly getting open source alterntives approved, using them, and telling coworkers they’re approved. It’s just one super specialized software left.

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nice!

        I work at a very small company, so there is no policy for which software to use and I would replace the one software that is Windows only if I could, even if I had to remain on Windows. The problem I have in this case is that we rely external tools that only work with this software, only on Windows. :-(

    • maxprime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Teams.

      I fucking hate teams.

      Why are we using teams.

      Why did they change outlook, it used to actually be good.

      • Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        There used to be a linux repo for installing teams but they recently removed it. Now you’re forced to use the shitty excuse of a PWA.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          The browser-based versions of the M365 apps work great* for me in Firefox tabs on Linux. I prefer them being just apps/sites that I use as needed and not deeply integrated with the OS just because the same company made the two.

          • I mean they work as intended for the same stuff I’ve used the Windows versions for, not that they are great apps on their own, lol
          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Teams doesn’t work well for me on Linux w/Firefox (it doesn’t detect my headset properly) but it works great in Edge.

        • maxprime@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Either way I’m stuck on W11 at work. No way am I installing teams on my machine at home.

      • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Teams can go fuck itself with a rock. We’ve taken licensing now that doesn’t include it.

        Still holding on to classic outlook as long as possible. The new version/skin/glow-up can go share the aforementioned rock with teams. Where’s my VBA, where’s my ribbon customisations, and why must it be dumbed down to Fisher-Price levels of ‘user friendliness’?

        A lot of my answers to user questions these days are ‘Because Microsoft ™️’.

        • maxprime@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You used to be able to paste any number of emails into a group in outlook. Now you have to add one email at a time.

          Got 100 email addresses to add to a group? Fuck you.

          No “upgrade” has impeded my productivity as much as W11 and the new office.

    • Emi@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Tried get my dad to use Linux for his work but had problems with his clients not being able to open the files he sent using the Linux word and Excell programs. So that’s clear for him not to use Linux.

        • Ziglin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Because of the requirements like TPM2 and a bunch of of others.

          Most places I know need to replace all their devices to support Windows 11. For the workload they are expected to run that hardware was fine.

            • Ziglin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              29 days ago

              Understandable, I don’t really see how it’s related to this thread though.

              • uranibaba@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                28 days ago

                Because you talked about my computer not supporting Windows 11?? So I clarified that it does support it and came pre-installed, and I would still prefer pop_OS (i.e. not relevant, as you said).

                I can’t believe your computers support Windows 11.

                I don’t understand why that would have to do with anything to being with, though.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    If it takes you hours to debloat Windows, you better stick with an OS you do know.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Every time I see a Linux user’s criticism of a problem with Windows, it’s the kind of thing your grandma asks you to fix for her and takes ten seconds 😂

      Calling Windows unstable in this day and age is fucking laughable too. If your installation is unstable, it’s either you or your hardware

      • szczuroarturo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeach windows has problems but stability is definietly not one of them. Likewise linux has problems but in fact it is not harder to use ( in fact it is so easy to use that it is reasonably popular to put some easy distro in some forsaken by time laptop instead of windows for pepole who use browser and literaly nothing else ). Frankly speaking most pepole just dont give enough f about their system. The best i can say about it is that pop os specificaly just looks better ( i am in the apparent minority of pepole that very much likes the looks of gnome ). The best way to populrize linux is to have it by deafult instead of windows on laptops and prebuilds but that will never really happen ( they make insane amount of money on Markup by having windows installed despite the fact that they get it for really really cheap. Its really apparent when you compare some laptops that can be bought without the os preinstalled )

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It should be flipped, tho. In my opinion, any “beginner distro” consumes more time in the long run run, compared to the “lightweight” ones (I bet my Arch is way fatter than many beginner distros, lol)

  • helpmyusernamewontfi@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    As a Linux user for a few years now I have to disagree. My friends who still rely on Windows only software for either school or their jobs use Revision OS and installs it with a tool called playbooks which takes only a few minutes and automatically disables feature updates; only allowing security updates to go through. This makes it so all “system updates” are through the playbook app which is pretty cool, it pretty much makes it a Windows fork and won’t revert or break anything when updating

    • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      1, Revision OS is awesome, and good on you for sharing it!
      2, I don’t think that’s you disagreeing really, just offering a “third path”.

  • vinyl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you are installing Windows with that route, you sure as hell won’t be picking beginner friendly distro.

  • hmm@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    i’ve seen someone installed Ubuntu LTS on his gaming pc. he said he has been spending hours to use it, in the end he decided to reinstall windows 11.

  • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    i will try Garuda. i will not go for the easiest, because i want to improve

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Garuda is amazing, but it definitely isn’t a beginner distro. Also, a lot of the design choices are questionable, so I still wind up changing a lot of things after installing it.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t know about Tumbleweed. Garuda isn’t difficult, unless you have to troubleshoot something. There are a few things to keep in mind, though:

          1. It’s an Arch distro. Arch is considered not beginner-friendly to begin with, and Garuda does some things differently. It’s very opinionated, and, like I said, some of the design choices are questionable.

          2. If you need to do anything on the command line, you should be aware that Garuda uses the fish shell instead of bash (which is the standard for Linux distros). You might also want to check out ~/.config/fish/config.fish, because there is some interesting, funny, and weird things in there. For example, ls is aliased to eza.

          3. Do you like macOS? Because that’s the default setup: global menu, dock, etc. You can change all that, but it takes a lot of work.

          There are a lot of good things about Garuda, though. There is tons of eye-candy. The fish shell is much more enjoyable to use than bash. The chaotic-AUR repository gives you access to even more software than standard Arch repos. And whenever you upgrade, it automatically takes a snapshot of your system, so that if something breaks, you can roll your system back to a previously-working version!

  • flemtone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Quite a few clients were unable to upgrade to Windows 11 on their current devices, I let them try out Linux Mint 22 Cinnamon edition and most of the switched over quite happily knowing it would let them do their daily tasks, the one’s who needed specific tools or games I setup a VM desktop for them to play with.

  • RGB@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just use winutil tool. Very fast to debloat and disabled telemetry. Of course if you can’t reasonably switch to Linux atm.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago
    • The third route: install Win11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
    • The fourth route: install Gentoo
  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Arch is driving down the middle, flipping off both sides while having the time of your life.

    (Caution: May be best or worst. Commenter may be heavily biased as he uses Arch btw.)

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    After months of trying, I still can’t get Linux to recognize the 2.5Gbit network cards, or to function with multiple monitors. If the hardware support was better, I would ditch Windows for good instantly.