• lnxtx@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    12 days ago

    If only there was an alternative.
    What if we replace vulcanized rubber with a metal ring 🤔

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 days ago

      Sounds like it’ll be rough on the road, but I’m willing to try it! /s

      I miss the trains of NJ and NYC so badly, this part of Texas fucking sucks with public transportation. Losing access to a car here has you flirting dangerously close to homelessness. Which is also why I’ll usually give a ride to anyone who asks around here.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    12 days ago

    Geez, here is another issue for which we’ve known about for 40 or so years that requires “urgent Action” for the past 40 years already

    Wake me up when we finally do something

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Boomers have categorically chosen apathy in favor of their own self interests since 1970. By the late 90s, they were a wrecking ball.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I disagree. People who live their entire lives being relentless bombarded by consumerist propaganda and pro-capitalist disinformation are not truly free to vote against it, nor were they given the chance. Al Gore cared more about the environment than Bush, but he was still a capitalist that supported car dependency and the military industrial complex.

        • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          So you’re absolving “Generation Me” of ever having to think for themselves? The same generation that could have educated themselves for less than the price of new car, and simply chose not to because a high school diploma was enough?

          Millennials were just as heavily, if not more propagandized, and yet, as a cohort, we have skewed far from Baby Boomers (ie Millenials are killing x), while retaining the ability to be critical of the systems we have inherited. We are also far more educated and far more in debt. All as a result of Boomers subsidizing their own welfare on the backs of their children and grandchildren.

          Baby Boomers collectively failed upward, soaked up benefit after benefit while telling themselves that they deserved their station in life, and then pulled up every ladder behind them.

          So, hard disagree.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          Which is why replacing First-past-the-post voting is so important. We need to have more then two options.

          Democrats believe in democracy right? What’s the hold up blue states?

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Most probably simply didn’t know. A lot has to do with policies made by politicians that did know. Don’t pretend to be better, you would have done the same back then with the information you had. Remember, no internet.

        • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          lol, ok.

          Despite your unfounded assumption, I’m old enough to know what it was like living pre-internet. Information was there, for those who chose to seek it out. Boomers, on the other hand, are the living definition of Dunning-Kruger. So no, they don’t get a pass. They chose to remain ignorant and uneducated, and when they gained any advantage, they made sure that those who came afterward would NOT. That’s not just a lack of awareness, it’s mean-spirited and selfish. Which fits “Generation Me,” to a T.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Well, no.

            I am from the generation after the boomers but I grew up right before the Internet exploded onto the world and i can tell you that you would never see that sort of information unless you were looking for it. I know people love to shit on boomers, hence boomers being an insult word these days, but many simply couldn’t know better.

            Hell, I didn’t know and believe me, I was (and still am) the kind of person that loves to read new things STEM. I had subscriptions on scientific magazines and I do remember reading articles about it being anything, scientists already knew about car tired being a problem, but it didn’t go beyond some reports. The general population didn’t know and pretending that they could have and should have known is simply disingenuous.

            If you were alive at that time then you too know that it wasn’t that easy.

  • Maetani@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    While there’s no doubt tires are bad for the environment, a quarter of all microplastics seems a lot, especially since plastic is everywhere. Gladly there’s a source for that claim, a link to tireindustryproject’s FAQ… Claiming that this number is a gross overestimation. What the fuck is this article? Is it supposed to be satire or something?

    • Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I’ve seen a similar number in a lot of proper scientific sources, so this article may be bunk, but the number is correct I think.

      For example this article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171003 They claim 27,26% in China.

      And this article: https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/2024-0106.pdf They claim 24.88% in the EU and state it’s among the biggest if not the biggest contributor to microplastics.

      I’m all for debunking stuff, but about a quarter seems to be the currently accepted quantity to the best of our abilities to measure.

      There is a bit of confusion between the amount tyres contribute into the ocean, how much into the ocean and waterways and how much in the environment as a whole. A lot of it ends up in the soil, so it doesn’t contribute to plastics in the water, but still in the environment.

      • Maetani@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        That was an interesting read. I guess tyre fragments (and industrial pellets) are just way bigger than the other big offenders, which would explain why they represent such a huge portion of the total mass, and why they are filtered out “easily”. Overall it seems to me that we really need to categorize the different microplastics better, as the current definition (anything plastic 5mm and under) seems a bit too large, and with all the mix ups, you can always blame something else.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’ve read arguments that typical plastic pollution never really wears enough to become micro plastics. Not that it’s ok, just that it stays in macro pieces

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    This is also yet another reason SUVs are bad: bigger tyres, higher weight, more wear, more pollution.

    It’s also another reason to have lower speed limits: less friction, less wear, less pollution.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      12 days ago

      You want trains because they are good for the environment.

      I want trains because chugga chugga choo choo.

      We are not the same.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      Unfortunately this is known since two decades or so. I have learned about it in Uni 5 years ago.

      I expect that car and tire manufacturers have been lobbying against this getting more attention extensively. There is no other solution except reducing car traffic.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    what’s the percentage comparison to microplastics that are released by the floating plastic island in the middle of the Atlantic?

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I can’t imagine much microplatics are getting chipped off of them. The tires have thousands of pounds of pressure being put on small surface areas when you round corners, where as a plastic bottleneck can dolphin into the water if hit by a large wave and not nearly as much friction placed on it.

      How I imagine it

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        so plastic floating in a salty ocean, being hit with wave after wave of hundreds if not thousands of tons of pressure 24 hours a day 7 days a week for literal decades all while slamming into other plastic bottles will release less plastic than tires?

        IDK. I think a wider study should be done.

        50-75 trillion pieces of plastic exist in the ocean today and makes up 80% of all marine pollution.

        plastic itself isn’t easily recycled either. tires on vehicles can be reliably recycled into other products like asphalt, roof shingles, new tires, etc.

        I think if the concern is about microplastics, there are bigger pollutants at hand that need attention before car tires.

        • JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          One question that’d be interesting to know the answer to is where it ends up at. I could imagine microplastics from the garbage island mostly staying around the island, whereas ones from tires will end up all over the environment.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    This makes people that harass people with vehicle drive-bys and creepy vehicle stalking just that much more destructive and shite evil.

    They might as well go exploit a child to poison a puppy dog like my neighbor the state patrol trooper did.