Just to compare, this is the utopian dream for Toronto:

There are approx. 18 cars and trucks in that image.

They are taking up SIGNIFICANTLY more space, and are causing traffic.

Still, we keep saying, “give us more of this, please!”.

Insanity or stupidity?

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    They don’t even know how good they fucking got it.

    That’s because this way of city planning is normal there. You wouldn’t think that making streets and sidewalks safe for human beings would be such a big deal, but to us it’s unheard of!

    When we put a pedestrian crossing with gasp, a signal, motorists around here lose their minds! Not really, they just ignore them. /s

    • ilega_dh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      It’s normal because people in the 70s put in a lot of effort and protesting to make it normal. I thank them every day for that.

    • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      That’s because this way of city planning is normal there.

      If we’re allowed to factor in “normality” here, it’s a good idea to add some context to what’s got you so ornery…

      It sucks that America’s urban development came alongside the commercialization of cars, but here we are.

      Yes Amsterdam is great, it’s a beautiful city with great public transportation. It tracks that a city founded in the 13th century would be designed for a population that walks everywhere.

      It’s a strange comparison to make.

      Perhaps in 500 years Americas infrastructure will suit whatever social transportation trend people will be arguing about online. Until then I’ll just do my best to minimize my impact and try not to be a cock.