All the stories on the FP are about labor relations and corporate shenanigans. So anyway, do you like Star Trek or Star Wars better? Anybody still ike to read old school sci fi, for example I really love Poul Anderson’s Polesotechnic League stories - the swashbuckling adventures of intersteller trador Nicholas van Rijn and his Solar Spice and Liquors company, David Falkayne, et al. Good old basic space opera.
I just started reading the dune series, after watching the movies, and I’m having a great time with it! Somehow the books do a better job of detailing the conversations between all the different characters, and setting the stage for movie 2.
I’ve tried star wars. Just didn’t like it like I do star trek
Not a fan of either but I did enjoy watching Lost in space recently. Also enjoyed reading Neuromancer
Is social media not technology? If you don’t want to see it, there are text filters.
By “social media” you must mean “echo chamber”. Criticism is completely appropriate.
By “social media” you must mean “echo chamber”.
Why…would you ever think that? Is everyone here echoing your sentiment?
Criticism is completely appropriate.
I wasn’t saying it was inappropriate, just inaccurate.
Neither, baratna. I am of The Expanse.
Y’know, I was just browsing earlier and thinking that there wasn’t even any technology stuff in my feed anymore, it’d all been subsumed by the political churn…
Anyhow, to answer properly: I like Star Wars’ aesthetic better, but Star Trek also had some incredible stuff. I’ve also been increasingly burned out on Star Wars since the Disney takeover, to the point I barely follow it anymore. Back in the day I was neck-deep in the community of nerds who loved analyzing how the technology in the setting worked!
But the real love of my science-fiction life is Babylon 5. Something about how they planned the show’s myth arc out over multiple seasons leading to huge payoffs for both characters and the overall story.
Disney is really milking it, but I loved Andor.
I like turtles
At time of writing, the top posts on this sub are about meta’s influence over politics, the enduring value of physical media, someone made an art gallery in doom, and Meta’s lack of censorship and how that affects minorities. This community is absolutely on topic discussing technology news and if you think otherwise, you are being absurd.
If you’re looking for articles about how some university claims they’ve invented a new battery 1 million times as powerful, stop diluting yourself. “Corporate shenanigans” of big tech companies IS TECHNOLOGY NEWS. Any statement to the contrary is pure hallucination about a world that never existed.
These people just want to talk about gadgets and none of the political implications, even though those implications are unavoidable. They are the classic centrist “apolitical” people who don’t realise they have politics, but they’re just default status quo acceptance and ignorance of oppression.
This is just an old man yelling at clouds. If the mods of this sub wanted to change the topics, they could, but it would probably tank the sub. The people complaining could start their own sub with their own rules, but I’ll bet it’s not nearly as popular. Plus it takes work, and people who think it’s a good use of their time to passive-aggressively whine about a sub they don’t maintain aren’t going to do that much work. They’re not cut out for it.
stop diluting yourself.
I hate to be that guy, but… it’s “deluding” in this context, unless OP is adding water to their body.
You mentioned a couple technical items but right now here are the top stories:
- Anti-LGBTQ+ speech is welcome at Meta, pro is not
- Tiktok tells LA staff to use PTO if they can’t work from home
- More LGBTQ+ stuff at Meta
- Spat between Tencent and US Defense Dept
- Something about USB logos simplifying branding
- UN opinion on taking down hate speech
- Viral ChatGPT-powered sentry gun shut down by OpenAI - HUZZAH! This article actually talks about the technology!!!
- Brazil complains about Meta’s new fact-check policies
- Unionization of the video game industry
- Meta disbands diversity team
- Lenovo making rollable OLED screens for laptops - WELL HEY THERE - ANOTHER TECHH ARTICLE!
- Complaining about bots on Lemmy
- It’s Total Chaos at Meta!
- Doom in an art gallery
- Google throws money at Trump inauguration
- New fast-charging lithium battery - HOLY CRAP, A THIRD TECHNICAL TOPIC OUT OF 16 - why, It’s practically raining tech in here!
- This post about science fiction, The next thing is about a Supreme Court ruling on Tiktok.
I think I’ve made my point. There’s almost no reason someone’s interest in technology would bring them here. It’s mostly political, social and business issues that happen to pertain to tech companies.
/unsubscribe
Your post inspired me to share a video about some wacky CES products.
I think I committed a few cardinal sins because it did not go well. Haha
Following that line of reasoning, Zuckerberg buying a yacht is also tech news. 🙄
You’re the one being absurd.
You accidentially had caps lock on for bit…
I used to love Star Wars, but the movies kept not being that good.
They focus too heavily on one family and have not really built a world for people to live in.
I think the new TV shows are starting to do this, but I haven’t watched them too much.
I would really love Star Wars much more if the world building was a bit better.
The Mandalorian, Andor, and Skeleton Crew are all good IMO.
IMHO, this community should be about technology. Novel inventions. Interesting or creative applications. Discoveries. Dangers, advances, impacts, experiments, tutorials, etc.
Instead, it’s overrun with stock market and business news having no more to do with technology than CEOs of wood pulp factories have to do with literature.
I wish Rule 2 was phrased in a way that clearly excludes the latter, and enforced.
Technology cannot be disentangled from society and the economics that create and develop it. Technology is social process, it is not a technical matter.
The idea that technology is a thing on its own, maybe even with its own agency, is an ideological stance pushed first and foremost by the people you don’t want to hear about exactly for the purpose of obscuring their role in the whole deal.
Yeah I prefer a post about coffee_drudge version 0.12 being released than what we have now.
I see a valid point for posting topics in the category “technology & society” etc. However, nowadays this a field of its own, so why not start a hardcore tech community?
What boggles my mind is that there have been about fifty movies based on Philip K. Dick and zero based on Poul Anderson.
Anderson has galactic empires, roguish heroes, dozens of alien species, strong females, etc etc.
I think that it because Dick could write short stories that could get made into movies. A lot more of the sprawling book series are only done justice with multi movie series or TV series.
Poul did a throwaway story that I’d love to see expanded into a series.
A group of time travelers from 4,000 AD travel back to Renaissance Italy. They run into an evil baron and his henchmen, including one very learned monk. A little torture and the Italians have their own time machine. They set up a base in 10,000 BC and raid across time. They know that the Time Patrol can only use things in the historical record, so as long as they keep a low profile they’ll never get caught.
PKD is special somehow. He’s the one author where, I think, the movies are better than the books pretty consistently. Maybe it’s luck or my flawed opinion.
I think Dick was writing to be read in a particular time and place. Take Dashiell Hammett. ‘Red Harvest’ works a century later. there are some references that are dated [wearing a red tie] but overall you can give the novel to a modern person without a great deal of explanation needed. ‘The Thin Man’ requires a ton of annotation to be understood.
imho.
Agreed. Partly because the movies have actual endings…
I love both Star Trek and Star Wars, but Star Wars has a lot of really toxic fans. These days I tend to be a quiet Star Wars fan.
I mean, it’s all news concerning technology, or tech companies. Did you expect there to just be constant posts about new tech or improvements to existing tech? Because that shit doesn’t happen every day.
Do we need a new post everyday?
I’ve kind of felt the same way, would rather have a somewhat-stronger focus on technology in this community.
The current top few pages of posts are pretty much all just talking about drama at social media companies, which frankly isn’t really what I think of as technology.
That being said, “technology” kind of runs the gamut in various news sources. I’ve often seen “technology news” basically amount to promoting new consumer gadgets, which isn’t exactly what I’d like to see from the thing, either. I don’t really want to see leaked photos of whatever the latest Android tablet from Lenovo or whatever is either.
I’d be more interested in reading about technological advances and changes.
I suppose that if someone wants to start a more-focused community, I’d also be willing to join that, give it a shot.
EDIT: I’d note that the current content here kind of mirrors what’s on Reddit at /r/Technology, which is also basically drama at social media companies. I suppose that there’s probably interest from some in that. It’s just not really what I’m primarily looking for.
I made !antisocialmedia@piefed.social for all the drama at social media companies
Hah, clever name!
