• Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    the problem is the plug is rectangular (has exterior rotational symmetry) AND not reversible - if the plugs were L shaped it would be clear by both feel and brief glance which rotation was correct

  • jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who find that “frustrating” have led too sheltered a life.

    • jsdz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      *with the exception of some who have specific disabilities

  • vivadanang@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    they should just go with perfectly circular, with different sizes for different applications. imagine a 20mm unit - high power/bandwidth hoses with a satisfying locking mechanism that magnetically seals the connection.

    and makes the proton pack sound. and rgb fuck nevermind go back this was a bad idea

    • Tibert@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Circular isn’t a great idea, and here are most of the idea why it is not : https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/528821/why-dont-we-have-a-circular-usb-port

      USB required to have a stable connexion, as it’s a digital signal and not an analog as jack ports, which just sends curent through it. Rotating the connector could maybe introduce issues for signal integrity.

      The usb connector has much more connectors than a jack port. It would take a very long hole to fit them all. (usb 3+, usb C…)

      Size constraint. USB C is flat, a round port is not. So it’s bigger in 1 way, but smaller in the other, and so creates more design challenges.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can bet you it’s incompetence. They failed upwards. Sure, protocol is great and universal, but connector is atrocious and it has nothing to do with cost. Few points in favor of this hypothesis:

      1. Plastic inside of the connector was initially black. Why chose hard to see color? Go with something easier to see;
      2. Connector is perfectly rectangular and only distinguishing feature they made hard to see. Don’t make ti symmetrical if it’s not reversible, basic design principle;
      3. Connector is perfectly rectangular making it difficult to insert. There’s a reason why most connectors have rounded corners, they are self-correcting, even TypeC does this;
      4. They made various different connector types but pushed for the only one with these issues. No one ever had doubts how type B or mini B or micro B go in.
      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one ever had doubts how type B or mini B or micro B go in.

        I agree with most of your post, but micro B is a step too far. That fucking plug was always inserted with the following procedure:

        1. Try to plug it in.
        2. Flip the side and try to plug it in again.
        3. Flip it again because you had the right damn side the first time.

        Always, always, always.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The worst thing about USB is that it always takes 3 attempts on average to get the fucker in if you don’t know the orientation of the port.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That would explain why they were able to fit so many gigs into such a small little device and sell it for like, 20$.