Nope, not me… I’m still trying.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    By original, do you mean an idea that was independently formed or an idea which formed before anyone else could think of it?

    • ehpolitical@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      A thought that came to you entirely independent of anyone else’s thoughts… something that no one before you has thought or imagined, so that it includes absolutely nothing that’s already familiar to you.

      • nef@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        By that definition no human has ever had an “original” thought.

        • ehpolitical@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Not true… every thought had to have been thought for a first time by someone, just not by us (it seems).

          • nef@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            it includes absolutely nothing that’s already familiar to you

            I truly do not believe that any thought exists without context, if you can find any examples I would be happy to be proven wrong.

            • ehpolitical@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Well, every single thought had to have been thought a first time by someone, no?

              • nef@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Sure, but by your definition any thought containing any kind of language would not be “original” because it requires familiarity with the language.

                • ehpolitical@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Now you’re breaking off into something else that fascinates me… symbolism as a highly efficient method of communication. If you test yourself, you’ll find it takes less time for your brain to process symbols than spoken words… and there’s a very short amount of time in there where your brain understands what it’s looking at without the need of any other language other than symbolism.