Recommendation algorithms operated by social media giants TikTok and X have shown evidence of substantial far-right political bias in Germany ahead of a federal election that takes place Sunday, according to new research carried out by Global Witness.

The non-government organization (NGO) undertook an analysis of social media content displayed to new users via algorithmically sorted “For You” feeds — finding both platforms skewed heavily toward amplifying content that favors the far-right AfD party in algorithmically programmed feeds.

Global Witness’ tests identified the most extreme bias on TikTok, where 78% of the political content that was algorithmically recommended to its test accounts, and came from accounts the test users did not follow, was supportive of the AfD party. (It notes this figure far exceeds the level of support the party is achieving in current polling, where it attracts backing from around 20% of German voters.)

MBFC
Archive

  • bruhssa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s time to get rid of US social media in europe. I don’t care if I won’t be able to engage on social media, we’ll have european social media at some point getting users. But we can’t let the US have such a large impact into our own society, how we vote, etc.

    Fuck Elon. Hope he’ll burn in hell.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’m getting stuff on Facebook, too. I’ve stopped engaging with political content on Facebook years ago, and every time I see something, I either block the account or click “Stop showing me posts from X”.

    It doesn’t even look like ads. It’s just stuff that Facebook seems to happen to be recommending to me.

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Coincidentally, I just read a mastodon post where someone did a basic experiment to see what kind of content TikTok is pushing.

    I was curious what a TikTok user might see if they made a fresh account. I provided no preferred content categories, and did not interact with any video in any way except the skip them.

    In my first fifteen minutes, I received:

    9 manosphere “inspiration” videos The official accounts of Tucker Carlson and Vivek 2 clips from each Fox News, and tabloids New York Post and Metro 1 “America first” rando 1 Copaganda vid of “cool” new police robots Elon’s nazi salute without context or commentary

    (they go on to list other things they saw after this.)

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Pepperidge Farms remembers when Conservatives complained about tech have a left leaning bias.

    Was that a confession like all accusations?

    • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      So, and I’m not at all arguing for them here let me be clear, but things like Reddit being dragged in the media for that jailbait subreddit and the Covid stuff causing lawmakers to basically say “hey if you keep allowing disinformation we are going to have to regulate it” is what they mean by leftist bias.

      I was reading yarvins bs the other day and that basically sums up the thinking.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Add YouTube to that. You go there without cookies and login, and after you watched some random (not even German) vids to get a home feed, you can be sure to find the AfD in there, just because your language is set to German.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Even if your content does not lean right wing (true crime/cults/court trials/lawyers, dog videos, craft videos, art videos, protest support music) on YouTube. Occasionally I’ll get a bunch of right wing bullshit all over…. And I’m like??? Then I have to block all of them and eventually they disappear only to resurface again sometime later.

  • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Sigh, the algorithms are controlled by likes, it has no idea the content is alt right. But they are nazis though so they obviously would want to and aren’t stopping it

    • robbinhood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Well at least there will be a bidding war with China!

      I want to put the /s sarcasm mark, but I’m not sure if it’s really sarcasm. More sad, sardonic humor but based on some potential truth.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    We need to constaly audit algorithmic timelines. There cannot be “trade secrets” here.

    It’s not like code auditing is some magic were not capable of - its a multi billion industry perfectly capable of managing this task and we have all of the existing tools and frameworks for it.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    reddit is doing this too, at first it leaned left but recently they allowed more astroturfing from right wingers to swamp the subs, so now they are banning any remotely things that can be critical of right wing views. the reason it leans more right is, because they are allowing so much trump based news like with MSM.

    • churlish@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s why I’m here. Reddit stopped being interesting and became just political.

      • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        And anything relating to gaza the comments are truly disgusting and disconnected from reality. Honestly all Reddit has become a battle ground of 80% hate and 10% people trying their best to fight back with another 10 not caring (in terms of commenters)

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          its also the place where people get banned very easily, so i had to avoid those subs to avoid getting banned myself.

          • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Yup, lost my decade + old account, but it is what it is, another app to get off of

  • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    All feeds on all platforms are skewed right if not even extreme right since years.

    You have to block (far) right channels on YouTube to not get their crap videos suggested again and again.

    Add to that the brain frying effect of short clip after short clip on IG, YT and TikTok you get those right wing zombies.

    We should really ban all of these platforms in the EU - including Xitter, FB. Allow only fully open space products hosted in Europe.

  • commander@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    What if people really want to see that stuff, though?

    We’re doing more harm than good when we try to control what people think instead of including them in the discussion.

    • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      My counterpoint to that would be that social media is a psychological drug with negative effects and if people want to be informed, they should go to a library and read.

      • commander@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        We have the greatest library in the history of mankind right at our fingertips.

        Part of being informed is, you know, discussing information.

        • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          And social media is not a library. Tiktok and X is not a library. It’s a collection of thoughts of humanity and bots controlled by an algorithm where it’s purpose is to manipulate you to consume. The Internet is not a library but it can give you access to libraries. The Internet is also now colonised for the purpose of manipulating people to consume.

          Right now, we are not debating. You’re telling me your opinion and I’m telling you mine. You want to be informed? Touch grass. Engage in human communication. Go. To. A. Library.

            • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              That’s was the original intent of social media but it doesn’t function that way now. It’s also filled with bots and you’ve got no idea if you’re actually talking to a human being. The only way to be sure is to touch grass so you’re actually outside the sphere of influence of misinformation and those that control the algorithm.

              Let’s go back to the topic at hand, which is whether or not we should remove fascist content from social media like Tiktok and X. These platforms are not a gateway to that library you linked to and you have to go out of your way, i.e. purposely search for it, to access it. Tiktok and X are full of sound bites that do more harm than good; posts with links to your library, for example, would not get the same exposure as, say, a sound bite promoting fascism. Case in point: the article.

              The generation that has grown up with 24/7 access to the Internet have no idea what it feels like to not have information streaming into your brain everywhere you look. When information is fed and available to you 24/7, you can’t learn to tell the difference between what’s bullshit and what’s not because the 24/7 stream is so overwhelming, all you have left is the will to scroll for sound bites. The only way to counter that is to step out of that stream and slow down the incoming information so you can process it and critically analyse it. Our brains can only process a maximum amount of information that is far below what an algorithm can do.

              And that library link, what are you reading on there right now? Are you researching talking points against fascism? Are you looking at the history of previous fascist regimes and how they came to be?

              • commander@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                you’re actually outside the sphere of influence of misinformation and those that control the algorithm.

                You think people you talk to outside of the internet aren’t influenced by social media?

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Anybody voting for anti-tax racist fascists is voting against their own interests, including anti-tax racist fascists themselves.

      • commander@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s fine if you think that, but you’re opening yourself up to controlling aspects of people’s lives you have no business controlling. You’re essentially taking on the role of their parent.

        People would say similar things to “justify” the war on drugs. “Drug users are hurting themselves, so we’re doing a good thing by keeping them illegal!”

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Research and Historic Examples both shows positive outcomes from voting against anti-tax racist fascists. The same is not true for the War on Drugs. What you’re attempting to describe is dogma and closed-mindedness which are present in every single political ideology. What you fail to understand is that identifying those individuals and trying to inform them is not dogmatic, it’s helping them make informed choices.

          Also, the proof that far right is overrepresented on social media compared to their share of the population shows that the services are biased, not that this is “what people think.”

          • Ledericas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            the war on drugs in the US, was an invention by nixon as a way to truncate/distract the public from his own problems when he was making scandal after scandal in office. NIXON, REAGAN, ,etc.

          • commander@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Right. And people can always point to “research” that says drugs are bad or “research” that says certain races are smarter than others.

            The problem is you’re trying to be some grand arbiter of truth, or deciding or those arbiters are, when historically every argument you’ve made so far has also been used to perpetuate lies.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              Drugs are bad, that was never in question

              Your assertion, since you’ve forgotten, is that the War on Drugs was bad, which research would agree with

              I’m sorry you’re struggling with this. I hope you get well soon.

              • commander@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                Drugs are bad, that was never in question

                Whew, glad you don’t get to decide what I put in my body.

                Your assertion, since you’ve forgotten, is that the War on Drugs was bad, which research would agree with

                Yes… and those who support the war on drugs can point to research saying drugs are bad. It’s sad this has to be spelled out for you.

                I’m sorry you’re struggling with this. I hope you get well soon.

                Ironic, considering you’ve shown us you can’t comprehend what you’re reading.

                • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  And if somebody points to research saying drugs are bad as justification for war on drugs, you can point to research that war on drugs is bad. Then they would get confused and start quoting every line of your comment one at a time as if to make it talk slower for them.

  • c1a5s1c@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s a German game called Wolf. Where two people are the wolf and the rest are the villagers. Each turn the two wolves open their eyes and pick a villager to kill, while the villagers keep their eyes shut. Then everyone guesses who the wolves are. If both wolves are caught, the game is over. Almost always, the wolves win.

    Moral of the story, an informed minority will almost always defeat an uninformed majority.

    I hope it doesn’t come to this in Germany…

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    What about IG? Every single sponsored post is some kind of grift: zionism, religion, prosperity gospel, scientology. It’s nonstop right-wing garbage.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Legalation banning algorithmic feeds and replacing them with chronological posts from users you subscribe to is imperative to fixing our politics and improving the mental health of young people.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Chronological is an algorithm too bruh. There’s nothing inherently wrong with algorithms, they’re just a tool. Modern social media tends to use them for engagement and advertiser$$, which is harmful.

      • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Making a video sharing app which isn’t based as much around a single algorithmic feed?

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      What if I want to install my own algorithm on a Pixelfed feed? What if developers make a variety of competing, open source algorithms? Y’all gonna ban all those “algorithms” too? Be careful of calling for state violence to impose your vague opinions.