• MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    So by my math and some googling, that’s about 0.00005% of Reddit’s MAU.

    On the one hand, cool, growth is growth.

    On the other hand maybe it’s… healthy to stop looking at Lemmy as an “alternative” to anything and start thinking about it as this small forum you like to use sometimes. Worked for me in the 90s, works for me now.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      You’re off by some orders of magnitude.

      It’s 0.005%

      But that’s based off of the 1.1 billion number I saw. Somehow I very much doubt there’s 1.1 billion people with accounts who login and browse at least once a month.

      • Bunbury@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Also never underestimate how many bots there are. And how many users have 10+ accounts. Seeing less evidence of that on Lemmy so far, though who knows honestly.

    • brot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Reddit is calculating its MAU differently. They seem to be counting even not-logged-in users coming from search engines - without that numbers like “1 billion monthly active users” really don’t make any sense and even that is a crazy metric, if you think about it. There is no way that 1/8 of humanity is browsing on Reddit in a month. Lemmy seems to count only users who are doing something (submitting, commenting, upvoting)

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 hours ago

        If they’re doing that, it means they’re counting unique IPs, which is a ridiculous metric. Even lemmy would have easily 10x the MAU with it.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Again, doesn’t matter. There’s data on logged in users and it’s also many orders of magnitude larger than Fedi.

          By most independent metrics Reddit has more visits than Netflix. Than Pornhub, while we’re at it. It’s one of the top ten most visited sites on the Internet, and by most accounts it’s actually grown since the “exodus”.

          I don’t use it and I do like it here, but the idea that Lemmy is somehow encroaching on it is absurd. And self-defeating, too. Lemmy and its satellites are very worthwhile for what they are… a gnat in the wind as a Reddit alternative. Better to measure them on their own merits.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Agreed, but the proportion of users that contributed and made it a positive experience there was significantly smaller.

            Quality over quantity.

          • cabinet_sanchez@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yeah, see my rant elsewhere in this comment section, but I personally do not desire Reddit 2.0. More users here will be good, but if Lemmy ever becomes the size of Reddit, even with its differences, it will not be what we want it to be anymore

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It doesn’t really matter. For one thing, MAU and unique users are different metrics and they’re both valid, so if Lemmy is counting verified uniques they can just call it that.

        For another, I looked at the data for logged in users and Fedi’s MAU is 0.125% of their daily logged in users, so the point stands regardless.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It may or may not be.

        It is definitely not inflating its numbers by the orders of magnitude it’d take to make a dent on this particular takeaway.

    • cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Totally, we don’t want numbers for the sake of numbers. We need passionate people who are ready to ditch other mainstream ones for federated alternatives. Then only we can grow.