https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vqmy5qrvaVQ

Performance is a bit laggy. I’d love a faster deck. I personally won’t buy an OLED as it’s not enough for me to upgrade

Heritage Foundation are a bunch of fascists

I think that comment works better the other way around.

Please make a version with Elon Musk

He is pointing to these apparent offers, likely to gain attention and as a way to pressure people to donate to his kickstarter.

Absence of government; the state of society where there is no law or supreme power; a state of lawlessness; political confusion

https://gcide.gnu.org.ua/?q=Anarchy&define=Define&strategy=.

Whatever you’re arguing for, I’d suggest using another word

Yeah this guy toying with selling is pretty insulting to anyone trying to help him out.

Nope. My comment is probably being misunderstood.

Man is an npc.

That’s funny because it’s not difficult at all to build an app like this. The value in buying such a business would be the scale of its user base, which is likely only several thousand at this point. And, if it were sold, most people would leave since most of those users are just dipping a toe in at this point to see what the app is like. Frankly, the content sucks. People are using this app out of goodwill and an interest in helping to build an alternative to the corpo apps. If dansup sells or does not open source, then that goodwill evaporates.

No one will unanimously trust a computer model. People will try to undermine and destroy it. So, the question would then be, how do you stop that? And suddenly you’re not really talking about anarchy. The computer will need to enforce its existence through violence.

I don’t think practically you could end up with a state of anarchism because it implies that humans can exist in a power vacuum. Something will always fill that vacuum. Now, the question is what is that thing? It can take a lot of forms. The goal should be to make it serve the qualitative needs of most people - food, shelter, well being, safety. People advocating for true anarchy are usually doing so from a naive idealism. Idealism is often good, but sometimes ignores other factors that make the ideal impossible to achieve.

I have friends around in other places, and where I live now, but things just are different in adulthood. On one hand, I can and do connect with some of these people occasionally. On the other hand, it’s not like my early life where every day I was around peers and hanging out with people. I’ve kind of adjusted to this and enjoy my solitude.

They exist just in case they need to crack down on you.

I always think of dog leash laws this way. In many places they aren’t enforced and the majority of dog owners let their dogs off leash. However, if the owner loses control of their dog and it gets into trouble, like biting someone or another dog, then the law can always say, you’re liable because your dog was supposed to be on leash.

I think the same goes for speeding and other laws. It basically puts liability on the lawbreaker if they take a certain risk. If nothing bad happens, fine. But, if something does, then it’s your fault.

He’s failed up his entire career

That works until there is a market for them and suddenly you’ve got people trying to grow their populations.

I don’t see how what they wrote is controversial, unless you’re a tankie.

Is it political spam? They were sending all political emails to spam, but then politicians complained, so they changed that policy.

You mean they ripped off the copyrighted material that OpenAI ripped off?