Once again you come down on the side of facts with admins behaving as reactionaries over veganism.
Despite all my rage I’m still a rat refreshing this page.
I use arch btw.
Credibly accused of being a fascist, liberal, commie, anarchist, child, boomer, pointlessly pedantic, a Russian psychological warfare operative, and db0’s sockpuppet.
Pronouns are she/her.
Vegan for the iron deficiency.
Once again you come down on the side of facts with admins behaving as reactionaries over veganism.
Here is a press release for the protest as proof I did not post any actual animal abuse.
https://www.peta.org.au/news/peta-barbecues-a-dog-in-a-sydney-shopping-mall/
It’s a photograph of a PETA protest posted to vegancirclejerk which endorses this sort of protest.
The image specifically has the text “vegan” in it, and the dog is a prop.
Given this instance endorses animal abuse for the purpose of food, what are the grounds for the ban? The vcj admin can remove the post if they feel it goes against the community (it doesn’t), people post bodyparts of animals to this instance all the time.
If footage of vegan protests is against the rules, that should be made explicit.
Positive, however I cannot post the proof.
Apparently! I cannot post the evidence that it was a dbzero admin.
However I can tell you that they
a) did not understand it was vegan content (says in image)
b) admits vegans are right
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I have been informed since the sent the reason via message neither of us can post it here.
Modlog actions. No reason given
But this instance has no rules against posting meat.
!vegancirclejerk@lemmy.vg notably, as the image shows, this is literally a vegan protest.
Here is how ethics works:
Since we are in the latter case, it is not self defense. Too bad, so sad.
Look I understand you’re trying to be positive but this doesn’t work. It’s not really viable for me to put more effort into explaining why each specific thing doesn’t work but take e.g. paper towels, well they rot. Unless you pack them up in an environment which they can’t rot in. Like a sealed mineshaft, which you could just pump co2 into. In either case you’re filling an empty coal mine with low density coal while using energy that could go to something with exponential payoffs like sustainable power infrastructure.
Protecting greenspace is good, reforestation is good and has all sorts of positive effects from stabilisation of local temperature to cleaning the air of pollutants. It is not however a solution to climate change. There is only one, and it is not burning fossil fuels. It is completely impractical to reverse the damage we have already done. We have added 0.02% of the atmosphere’s mass in co2, that is 1.E17 kg or a hundred million billion kilograms.
Trees don’t permently sequester carbon. A forest is a bunch of bound up stuff, but since fungi can now digest trees when they die they don’t become coal anymore.
So unless you want to make the surface of the earth rainforest somehow you would need to bury trees in a sealed sterile mine or something. Or you could just do that directly.
Carbon capture is kinda dumb though, coal and oil are what ideally captured carbon looks like. We should focus on not digging that up and burning it.
2things.
Funny that people are trying to evangelise time wasting brainrot
Also you must have so much useful time without the time wasting brainrot.
goes back to watching people process clay for some insane reason
As the day goes on
fixup=fixup -fuck
fuck
bleh
some bug squashin
implement stuff
Fixes configuration issues, and improves the UI for setting it up
fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you
Why do you care more about a painting frame and disrupting a day at the gallery than the likely prospect of entire fucking inhabited islands being submerged? Will you hide in an art gallery when millions of refugees are pounding at your door demanding the entirely reasonable right to resettle in the less ravaged land of the climate ravagers?
What have you done to try target oil execs? How much money have you put on the line paying the legal fees of people that target them? Have you risked your safety and freedom in radical protests?
From what position do you criticise them? What do you see as the likely outcome of the future? Do you see people living like you changing that?
God damned. LLMs are just the rapture for hopeless dorks.
Unlike tissue paper yaml is actually fit for purpose. I actually don’t know of any lang that literally can’t run a program. The most you could stretch what you’re saying to is that some esolangs are akin to making bricks of packed tissues to build with. They are art projects not serious submissions though.
I don’t like js as much as anyone else but as evidenced by reality it works. Programmers need to stop sniffing their own farts, you have such strong opinions about the most insane shit when at most you should be talking about narrower scopes for use and trade offs.
Hey would you rather build from wood or steel?
What glue is better: 2 part epoxy or PVA?
Do you prefer soap or bleach as cleaning agent?
As a trans woman who wears jeans and Ts and feels more at home in a machine shop than a stitch and bitch (although stitch and bitches rock) the narrative that feminine coded behaviour is a necessary and/or sufficient condition for being a trans woman is deeply damaging medicalised bullshit.
Don’t push people to perform cisness or transness, just let them discover themselves.