Not sure if this was already posted.

The article describes the referenced court case, and the artist’s views and intentions.

Personally, I both loved and hated the idea at first. The more I think about it, the more I find it valuable in some way.

    • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It is a stupid point, and hardly art, but even you should be able to understand it by now if you read the other comments come on

    • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Weird how sexism is okay if it’s against men.

      Would you have the same reaction if women got mad about being banned from an art exhibit?

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not if it was an exhibit about misogyny…

        You are so eager to be a victim you have deliberately missed the point. Poor men.

        • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Not if it was an exhibit about misogyny…

          I don’t believe you, but ok.

          You are so eager to be a victim you have deliberately missed the point.

          Lol. That’s ironic coming from you.

          Poor men.

          Imagine if I said the same thing about women. Would probably get my comment removed, haha.