• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So we can’t use technology to make life easier and faster?

    Sure you can be out there for 10 hours fighting the wind with a broom doing a 60% job or you could be done in 10 minute with a leaf blower and be 99% done. It does it better in a fraction of the time.

    Fuck people for getting chores done and enjoying life eh?

    Better use a scythe to cut your grass, no mowers for you….

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Alternatively, let the leaves lie - which is beneficial to insects as well. And lets your neighbours enjoy life :)

      But a suggestion from the post you’re replying to is using an electric one.

      • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Let the leaves lie on the grass sure (and mulch them assuming it’s not too many) but you still need a blower for all the other areas; concrete, landscaped rock, etc. They’re also used for snow all the time where I live. Nothing wrong with an electric blower.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          i’m still trying to figure out why a blower is going to do anything for snow? You know that snow blowers exist right? I can’t imagine anything other than a snowblower/shovel is going to work effectively on anything that isn’t a very small layer of fluffy snow, god forbid you get any heavy snowfall, or it thaws and refreezes. Just seems like a complete nightmare to me.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Actually, you know what? With that bullshit attitude, yeah, maybe you shouldn’t be allowed to use technology to get your “chores” done faster. If you’re picking destructive and disturbing over leaves-on-the-ground, then you’ve proven yourself incapable of making good decisions at this time.

      • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You understand blowers aren’t just used for leaves right? They’re great for all sorts of debris in all the difficult or impossible to get places (imagine rocky landscaping for example). Isn’t the issue 2-stroke blowers but not blowers in general? What’s wrong with electric?

        • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          They’re less annoying and polluting but still a fucking nuisance. And most of the time they’re just used to achieve some idiotic standard of cleanliness, without any practical usefulness.

          • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            This is likely region dependant I suppose.

            I’ll push back a little on the “most of the time it’s just for idiotic cleanliness standards” part there as I’ll assume it’s referring to homeowner use which I’d argue is likely not the ones using blowers the most often. Keeping walkways and ramps etc clear of slippery leaves, snow, or other debris is super important in all our public spaces and nothing does that job as quickly or as well as a blower.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve got an electric powered one, it’s just as loud as a gas one, but still within municipal sound limits.

        Sorry, find something else to complain about.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            They produce the same DB the percussive sound of the engine travels further. At the point of sound they can be just as loud.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Once you’re about that distance away you’re safe from hearing damage even if it’s annoying to listen to.

                It’s only important for people using the equipment and their crew. If you’re that close, the fuck you doing that close lmfao.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          you’re very wrong btw.

          This is a well known fact about how sound travels through the environment. Lower pitch noises (gas engines) tend to travel very far and very aggressively. They’re so much more potent.

          High pitched whining sounds (electric motors) don’t travel nearly as well as lower pitch sounds, and they tend to be much much quieter at distance.

          Combine that with the sound profiles of the ICEs compared to the constant whine of an electric motor in a certain part of the spectrum of audible sound. Now you have modulation on the ICE which is going to be much more potent to begin with, since it’s an entirely different sound profile. As well as being much harder to tune out, given the fact that it’s not just a persistent whine.

          This is why the abrams powered by a gas turbine are known for being incredibly quiet, even though when up close, you can still hear them loud as shit. The sound just can’t travel through the environment as effectively, and like i said, even if it does. It’s not exactly the incredibly distinct sound of an ICE.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I addressed that in another comment, at the point source the DB is the same, but the percussive sound of the engine travels further.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              yeah, and that’s a good thing?

              I mean sure you might have to wear hearing pro still. But that’s not my problem, what is my problem is having unavoidable hearing damage from my neighbors who are currently mowing.

      • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Golf courses, definitely. I managed a hardware store for a while and our primary customer for reel mowers, as well as sharpening services for the same, were golf courses.

        • Voyajer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That makes sense. In town I still see enough of them that they stand out, but these aren’t huge yards or anything either.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        but to make them, and ship them to you is more destructive than a scythe.

        That’s how stupid these arguments are. Forgetting the big picture while looking at a blade of grass.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What job exactly? What are you trying to achieve that would outweigh the noise and pollution, you’re creating?

      • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Clearing leaves in ten minutes with a minor annoyance to others while saving themselves what little time our corporate overlords allow us to have?

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      So we can’t use technology to make life easier and faster?

      I can rake a yard in half the time it takes you to blow your leaves into a pile. People here in California spend hours - HOURS - blowing around leaves. It’s NOT efficient.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Your aren’t getting as good of job done, that’s just reality, and maybe they should use a vacuum option instead? Same noise, more efficient.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      So we can’t use technology to make life easier and faster?

      Not when it makes the lives of others shorter and worse.

      I mean, you CAN, just not without being a dick 🤷

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hard physical labor like raking and shoveling snow is directly linked to increased heart attacks, so that’s kinda disingenuous.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      When I wrote my comment I was thinking of the municipality workers with these gadgets in my area, sometimes using no ear protection! Hardly anyone at home, where there’s mostly just small gardens, uses these super noisy things.The city council probably thinks that they are saving a lot of money and time and giving their workers a much easier time. And like I wrote : I’ve read that devices running on electricity are quite silent. If there can be electricity poles for E.V. why not for this ?

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        My electric battery one is just as noisy as most gas ones. They just aren’t feasible for city work since they would need a genset to charge them anyways, or they would be having to need 60 batteries for one crew for a day.