• someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Bbbeeee aaaafffffrrrraaaiiiiiddddddddddddd!1!!1!!!1!!!1!!1!!!1!!!

    C’mon. Chernobyl was like a drunk driver bypassing the blow device, and now you want to ban all cars everywhere for everyone and everything for eternity. Just to replace it with horses that kill even more people.

    • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      When I misuse a coal plant, it breaks down and potentially pollutes the vicinity. When I misuse a photovoltaic plant, it might get damaged. If I misuse a nuclear plant, an area becomes uninhabitable for centuries.

      But accidents are not the main concern, when there are currently nuclear power plants being held hostage in an ongoing war

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        See you’re treating all nuclear plants and operation of those plants as the same. It’s not. Just like car designs are not the same as they were in 1950, nuclear plant designs are not the same as they were in the 1950s.

        You know Chernobyl was because they threw the operating procedure out the window right? But you want to act as if that’s just the normal operating procedure. And that it could just happen just because, just from normal operating or something. It’s insane.

        So you think the US, UK, France, Germany, etc etc etc nuclear plants will be taken hostage by Russians? See you’re on your fear campaign once again. Beee aaafffrraaaaiiiiddd!1!11!! That’s all it is.

        *Have to correct “misuse coal”. It’s not misuse, it’s use. Using coal guarantees polluting both locally and the entire planet.