I know Florida, Texas, and other counties have tried and succeeded to ban books, I wonder how that is even legal since we have the first amendment. I tried doing research on this since Huntington Beach is banning books and people were petitioning against that at the main library.

I made a little post asking people to petition on the Orange County sub.

  • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    They’re not banning you from selling, buying, owning, or reading the book, so it’s not an obvious first amendment issue.

    They’re creating policies for which books various government institutions can use tax money to buy and make available.

    They just happen to be targeting books that recognize the existence of minorities, which is shitty.

      • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        This is a school district not renting space at the school to a non-profit that intends to distribute the books. That’s a problem. The same thing happened to the after school Satan club. But framing it as “banning you from owning those books” doesn’t seem honest.

        It’s plenty bad when publicly owned rental space is denied to some renters based on viewpoint discrimination. I hope they win their lawsuit. There’s no need to equate it with police raiding houses to confiscate books and arresting bookstore owners.

        • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, this looks like a procedural issue.

          I’d guess that the district was looking for a reason and found this violation of their procedures to deny the space as an excuse. There’s a chance that the lawsuit exposes some messeges or emails that reveal the true intention.

  • zout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    In the Netherlands, only one book I know of used to be banned (maybe it still is). The publishing rights of the work in question were claimed by the state in this instance, and they refused to allow publication of the book. The book in question was the Dutch translation of Hitlers “Mein Kampf”.

    • Successful_Try543@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      As the author of that book is now dead since more than 70 years, the copyright has expired and it theoretically can be reproduced. It may be still on a list as ‘harmful for young persons’, propaganda or alike.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Most of these bans are not about banning those books in general, they are about not making them available in schools or public libraries. The government can decide what to promote in its own institutions. People can still get those books from elsewhere: they can buy them online or in physical bookstores.

  • corvett@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    29 days ago

    There’s a difference between a book being

    • banned from curriculum
    • banned from a school library
    • requiring parental / guardian permission to be checked out (usually for x rated content)
    • being outright “banned”