![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
If the cocaine just replaces the pit, it’s the best of both worlds and less work!
If the cocaine just replaces the pit, it’s the best of both worlds and less work!
Tree pretty
Can confirm also BASICA, GWBASIC, QBASIC, and QuickBASIC
This is a school district not renting space at the school to a non-profit that intends to distribute the books. That’s a problem. The same thing happened to the after school Satan club. But framing it as “banning you from owning those books” doesn’t seem honest.
It’s plenty bad when publicly owned rental space is denied to some renters based on viewpoint discrimination. I hope they win their lawsuit. There’s no need to equate it with police raiding houses to confiscate books and arresting bookstore owners.
They’re not banning you from selling, buying, owning, or reading the book, so it’s not an obvious first amendment issue.
They’re creating policies for which books various government institutions can use tax money to buy and make available.
They just happen to be targeting books that recognize the existence of minorities, which is shitty.
Me when i see yer mum!
I came here to say this!
Form a bubble under the tip of my tongue, scoop it up, fold tongue, gently blow.
They could still track your searches, and still use that data to put targeted ads on other people’s sites.
Even then, it depends on the state and whether you have positive equity.
Jesus, being all-knowing, would direct you to Bing.
“Directly” is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.
Try opening a finance company called Marcus or glasses called Warby Parker.
Depends where you put it.
No. Are you capable of sticking to one claim long enough to defend it, or are you just raging at the filthy whores?
And now the goalpost moves from illegal enough to deserve being locked up, to “inappropriate behavior” in the opinion of the people running the webcam.
Are you capable of arguing in good faith?
Different places have different laws, news at 11.
Is she responsible for following another country’s laws?
If an American shows a Brit their 10” hunting knife on webcam, should they be locked up?
Nice try, though.
In New York, exposing genitals is illegal for everyone.
In New York, exposing nipples is legal for everyone.
You’re the one advocating for a double standard.
If you just want the law to be “women can’t wear things that make my peepee hard”, move to Saudi Arabia.
In New York, women have the same rights as men as far as those laws are concerned. There are annual topless bike rides, for fuck’s sake. Damn puritans trying to force their religious repression on the rest of us. Same people would’ve publicly whipped women for showing their ankles had they been born a bit earlier.
For what crime?
A lot of PC gaming at the time required a level of computer literacy that generations on either side would associate with compsci students, or at least dedicated hobbyists. If you didn’t specify a console, that may’ve been his assumption.