• _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Garbage. They started this in order to provide very poor people the means to program and create things.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Introduced in 2014, the Pi gained the familiar 40-pin GPIO header and 512MB of RAM, yet it can hardly be called a ball of fire when compared to more modern hardware from the company.

    Pi supremo Eben Upton was delighted with how things have gone so far and said in a statement: "The reaction that we have received is a reflection of the world-class team that we have assembled and the strength of the loyal community with whom we have grown.

    “Welcoming new shareholders alongside our existing ones brings with it a great responsibility, and one that we accept willingly, as we continue on our mission to make high-performance, low-cost computing accessible to everyone.”

    Some users have expressed mixed feelings about the IPO, noting that the money would be helpful for R&D and new projects, however, the flotation underlines the fact that the company is a business.

    As for the future, Upton told The Register earlier this year that while he remains at the helm of the organization, it would continue to do interesting work and try to keep making money.

    The Reg hopes this is the case, but think it’s fair to say that pleasing both the corporation’s customers and shareholders might end up being more challenging than obtaining a Raspberry Pi 5 at launch.


    The original article contains 498 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 57%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Pi Picos (which are notably microcontrollers and not computers) have had clones for like $2 on Aliexpress for some time now, and devices like the Orange Pi and similar have existed for years.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Guess I should stock up while I can huh?

    I’ve been a RPI fan since the beginning and have used their boards for all sorts of projects and tinkering. But it’s hard not to feel like it’s losing sight of what made it attractive in the first place: low power and low priced computing. It had its charm in buying a Pi Zero and just chucking emulators on it and handing them out to folks who might want to have a go.

    But with the more expensive, more powerful hardware you just can’t really use them for things like that anymore. Just too expensive and too much oomph for the use case.

    We’ll see if the company finds its way. But this usually isn’t a good sign…

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    pis have gotten less exciting over the years.

    for those who are purely using the compute side of the pi is not as interesting anymore due to the flood of both 3rd party options, as well as used dirt cheap micro pcs (e.g Optiplex 9020 micros, 7040 micros, thinkcentre 710q)

    and for those who program , they have to split based on usecase. for pure robotics and less compute, there isnt much of a reason to use a pi over an arduino. for IoT, using ESP32 are more useful for device to device communication, so pis sat in this weird spot where you needed it for basic compute (e.g. some object detection) or you needed the community behind pi. but since pis are being bought out by corpo, doong hobby work on a pi is too expensive nowadays. to me, pis died after their pricing tiers for memory not really being great (2019)

    • Veraxus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think they’re playing the same game OpenAI is. Nonprofits can “own” for-profits.

      No, it’s not rational or ethical or reasonable, but it’s a thing, because Capitalism gotta Capitalism.

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nonprofits can “own” for-profits.

        One of the saner reasons for this structure is that the non-profit owns the things the for-profit works on. If the for-profit goes under, all things are still owned by the non-profit, so some large tech company can’t swoop in and yoink anything available.

        This includes any and all data generated by the for-profit, which means your data is “safe”.

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d argue it was taken from us several years ago when Raspberry made the decision to prioritize business customers over education and hobby during the chip shortages.