• Kros@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Well I guess the lack of availability that never let me get into pi’s the last few years was a good thing. R.I.P.

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      I’d argue it was taken from us several years ago when Raspberry made the decision to prioritize business customers over education and hobby during the chip shortages.

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Eh, the only thing that made RPi better than the alternatives was the size of the community and the amount of testing done for their hardware.

    RIP.

    Looking forward to whatever SBCs the community migrates to in the next year or so.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      The new ones are power hungry expensive monsters anyway. There are cheaper clones out there and I had pretty much decided never to pay for the gucci brand anymore.

          • thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            Yes indeed.

            The last project I did with one was build a moon and tide clock - all written in python with a motor controller, external display and individually addressable led lighting.

            They’re also great as diy audio streaming devices for whole home audio.

  • Swarfega@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Loved the Pi for hosting small services around the house. I’ve just replaced my Pi4 with a N100, 16GB, 512GB SSD mini pc which is so much faster, not to mention cheaper than a Pi5.

      • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        I have a dell wyse 5070 with a j4105 cpu that runs home assistant with frigate and z2m around 3-5W with a bluetooth and zigbee stick attached. If more processing is needed it will boost to 15w for example during docker container updates, but it will also perform much better in these situations than the PI does. It costed me ~85€ from a refurbish shop and even had 1 year warranty. It came with 4gb ram, 128gb ssd, power supply and case ofc. It was a no brainer at the time when just the PI4 alone was like 80€ for 4 gb ram version if you could find it in stock. And that didn’t include case, power supply or sd card.

        • Swarfega@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          Indeed this. Plus my minipc has dual ethernet which is handy as I run Proxmox and use the second nic for migration traffic. The mini pc is way better than the Pi for my usage.

      • Grippler@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Not sure what a pi4 uses, but my NUC (16gb ram, 1tb NVME, quad core i3 up to 2.4ghz) running my smart home (HA in a VM) and a few other small services in LXCs uses ~7W on average. Loads more compute power if I need it at half the price. Even if a pi4 draws half the power, that’s only $8 saving per year.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Introduced in 2014, the Pi gained the familiar 40-pin GPIO header and 512MB of RAM, yet it can hardly be called a ball of fire when compared to more modern hardware from the company.

    Pi supremo Eben Upton was delighted with how things have gone so far and said in a statement: "The reaction that we have received is a reflection of the world-class team that we have assembled and the strength of the loyal community with whom we have grown.

    “Welcoming new shareholders alongside our existing ones brings with it a great responsibility, and one that we accept willingly, as we continue on our mission to make high-performance, low-cost computing accessible to everyone.”

    Some users have expressed mixed feelings about the IPO, noting that the money would be helpful for R&D and new projects, however, the flotation underlines the fact that the company is a business.

    As for the future, Upton told The Register earlier this year that while he remains at the helm of the organization, it would continue to do interesting work and try to keep making money.

    The Reg hopes this is the case, but think it’s fair to say that pleasing both the corporation’s customers and shareholders might end up being more challenging than obtaining a Raspberry Pi 5 at launch.


    The original article contains 498 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 57%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Pi Picos (which are notably microcontrollers and not computers) have had clones for like $2 on Aliexpress for some time now, and devices like the Orange Pi and similar have existed for years.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Guess I should stock up while I can huh?

    I’ve been a RPI fan since the beginning and have used their boards for all sorts of projects and tinkering. But it’s hard not to feel like it’s losing sight of what made it attractive in the first place: low power and low priced computing. It had its charm in buying a Pi Zero and just chucking emulators on it and handing them out to folks who might want to have a go.

    But with the more expensive, more powerful hardware you just can’t really use them for things like that anymore. Just too expensive and too much oomph for the use case.

    We’ll see if the company finds its way. But this usually isn’t a good sign…

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Garbage. They started this in order to provide very poor people the means to program and create things.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’m glad they came out as what they already were.

    It was clear that they did not feel as a non-profit foundation for many years now.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      For months it was impossible for me to get any Pis at MSRP and then my employer suddenly bought 30 of them to use for signage around the office. That’s when I knew the non-profit hobbyist/enthusiast org was gone.

      I’m not worried about it though. In the meantime a lot of other stellar SBCs have emerged on the market.

        • Toribor@corndog.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          Honestly I still haven’t had a chance to try them out myself so I can’t make a specific recommendation but that market has been exploding recently. I have a sort of nice problem where people keep gifting me their Raspberry Pi’s once they aren’t sure what to do with them so I keep accumulating them without trying.

          That being said, the big ones I’ve had my eye on lately are things like the Odroid N2+, the Jetson Nano, the Rock Pi or the Banana Pi. Some of these cater more towards being integrated into projects that need a lot of GPIO, others are focused on just being a low cost low power headless server or thin client.

          The SBC market seems healthy enough that by the time I need another SBC I’ll have a lot of options. Biggest loss is just that having one extremely popular hobbyist board made it really easy to find solutions to issues in the community and now there is just a lot more variety out there.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Raspberry Pi Holdings has always been a for-profit company. This isn’t some sort of new news with them going public.

      The Raspberry Pi Foundation is a separate organization that has not gone public and continues to operate as a nonprofit. In fact, the IPO was structured to raise some funds for the foundation’s global impact fund.

      I am not saying that the IPO is a good thing, in fact I’m pretty certain it isn’t, but it’s worth knowing that Raspberry Pi is two different organizations with two different missions.

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    pis have gotten less exciting over the years.

    for those who are purely using the compute side of the pi is not as interesting anymore due to the flood of both 3rd party options, as well as used dirt cheap micro pcs (e.g Optiplex 9020 micros, 7040 micros, thinkcentre 710q)

    and for those who program , they have to split based on usecase. for pure robotics and less compute, there isnt much of a reason to use a pi over an arduino. for IoT, using ESP32 are more useful for device to device communication, so pis sat in this weird spot where you needed it for basic compute (e.g. some object detection) or you needed the community behind pi. but since pis are being bought out by corpo, doong hobby work on a pi is too expensive nowadays. to me, pis died after their pricing tiers for memory not really being great (2019)