GitCode, a git-hosting website operated Chongqing Open-Source Co-Creation Technology Co Ltd and with technical support from CSDN and Huawei Cloud.

It is being reported that many users’ repository are being cloned and re-hosted on GitCode without explicit authorization.

There is also a thread on Ycombinator (archived link)

  • Freuks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    China cares of nothing, from patents to licences. Culture of steal and copy, rebrand and sell/use

  • smb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    that could come in veery handy once microsoft wants to pull some plugs. i guess we can be grateful for the backup that is 1. not 100% in m$ hands any more then and 2nd cannot be as easy destroyed as some backups at archive.org. i actually hoped for someone with enough money to create this type of security after m$ assimilated github and thought like “does nobody see the rising danger there?” but even if china’s great fork might be more reliable than m$ over time, maybe it’s better to have your own backups of all the things you actually may need in future.

    btw did microsoft manage to get rid of the hackers that settled into their network for … how long??

    i guess they’ll tell

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I hate authoritarian regimes, but why hosting cloned repos is bad?

    EDIT: https://lemmy.world/comment/10853810

    It appears to be scam-type(capitalism with beastly grin type) mirror. Not saying that hosting mirrors is bad in itself.

    • menas@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Law do not exist by itself; it’s the result of balance of power. How would you know that your State do not use illegally free software ? And if you know it, could you sue it ? Even if it’s a classified administration ?

      Apply laws Internationally is even worse. It usually depends of the imperialist relationship between States. For exemple, Facebook rules was illegal in France, but France changes it’s laws rather than sue Facebook. A decade later, the whole European Union could forte RGPD upon the GAFAM.

      China have nothing to fear in ignoring those licence, and we shouldn’t rely on it to protect our work. However we could strengthen our common defenses, through FOSS for people in the US … and maybe trade unions elsewhere.

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I do believe it’s illegal if they take a repository with a restrictive license (which includes any repository without a license), and then make it available on their own service. I think China just doesn’t care.

      • Themadbeagle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Illegal according to who?

        The US? Why would China care, they are their own country with their own laws.

        International courts? Who is enforcing those judgments?

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Classic Chinese tech co, if you can’t create something on your own just download the source files and say you made it. The money spends the same after the fact, anyhow.

  • A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    GitHub are not some bastion of righteousness - they are literally owned by Microsoft. And they work hard to stop people from getting too much Open Source from them, with rate limits and the like, so essentially gate keep.

    I think CSDN probably want to gatekeep their clone even harder, but in general having archives of GitHub on the Internet is a good thing.

  • maxinstuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    If it’s a public repo do they need permission?

    Not saying this is good, but you can’t really argue that it’s not a natural consequence of open source.

    • Kayn@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m noticing this misconception in a lot of places.

      Just because something is on GitHub, doesn’t mean it’s open source.

      • maxinstuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I get what your saying, in that open source projects normally have a licence that applies to how it’s used - but this has always been open to abuse.

        Nothing has ever stopped things like this happening - see how industry has taken advantage of open source for decades (often productising things as their own in the process).

        • Kayn@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          The industry takes advantage of open source projects that have permissive licenses. This is an important distinction.

          If you didn’t release your code with a permissive license (or even with a license at all), you have rights that protect you and your code. The only issue is that copyright infringement can often be hard to prove if you didn’t plan ahead for it.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        All major licenses allow it. GPL-family, BSD-family, MIT/X11, CC-family. Anything FSF-approved or OSI-approved.

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Most projects on GitHub don’t have a license, which means it’s not allowed.

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Great! Now I know who to contact when I accidentally delete all the plaintext API keys and passwords I had stored in a public github repo.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Apart from the dozens of scrape bots that already stole them?

      You’re supposed to revoke API keys that are leaked. Not try to “unleak” them

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I hope they copy the web interface too. I stopped using GitHub for my dumb little projects when Microsoft bought them and I can’t be bothered to learn git. I will gladly host my future projects there if it’s good.

  • callmepk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think the major issue is here is that they are “mirroring” with the same username without clear indicating they are mirrors and they are modifying all the github links in Readme to GitCode. But if you want to claim your project, they want to only comment using the issue section of a project which requires account; but then you have to have a Chinese phone number to register account, and you will automatically get a Huawei Cloud account when you registering it

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago
      1. All code provided there requires “coins” to download, even they are open-sourced code; it was reported multiple people in China got scammed via CSDN;
      2. You have to login to copy code on the post, and sometimes hides half the post to require you to login to read.

      Oh fuck! Capitalism with beastly grin strikes back.