• acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Germany equating its historic debt to Jewish people with support for a particular state is an absolutely disgusting distortion of the German obligation of remembrance.

    Just like this, they throw under the bus any anti-Zionist Jew.

    Honestly, when it comes to Israel/Palestine, the German state should just do what their other genocide victim, Namibia, told them to do and shut the fuck up. Stay the fuck out of it. Say the honorable thing that you will abide by the rulings of international courts. Provide humanitarian aid, help refugees. Be a ray of light and humanity, not a stickler for rules and definitions. Don’t be so goddamn fucking German for a change.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      its historic debt to Jewish people

      One would assume this debt would be repaid with German lands and monies, rather than land and money looted from Arabs a continent away.

      Honestly, when it comes to Israel/Palestine, the German state should just do what their other genocide victim, Namibia, told them to do and Shut. The. Fuck. Up.

      Yeah, crazy how the Germans are full throated supporters of Israel, but you never see them waving big Nambia flags and asserting the rights of African state sovereignty. I’m forced to wonder why, as I flip through my history book of “German Prime Ministers After 1949”.

    • suction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s the dumbest take ever. Look up the history of Israel and then tell us again how “it’s just a random state why does Germany care lol” isn’t.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I didn’t say it’s a random state, I said it was a particular one. It is one particular expression of Jewishness, when others also exist. Precisely because of the history of Germany, the German state has no business whatsoever to play arbiter about which version of Jewishness is the most authentic.

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      What this person said.

      ~ sincerely, a German

      (Seriously though, the situation here is intense. Our minister of education is currently under pressure to resign by the scientific community (which she refuses to do) because her ministry was looking for ways to defund / revoke grants to 400 university researchers who had criticized the way in which a pro-Palestinian protest was handled. That’s all it takes.)

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I mean you can always move to a country which better suits your political leanings 🤷 and you probably should, chuddy.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not accepting israels right to exist is a call for genocide against israel. Israel exists and has the right to exist. You can recognize that and still be against Netanyahus government.

      • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It isnt. No settler state has a right to exist, the settlers already there should integrate into the indigenous culture or leave. This includes the US, Canada, Australia and so on.

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          This includes Functionally EVERY state with incredibly few if any exceptions. Whens your line for when a conqueror becomes a local?

          • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            migration =/= colonialism

            To expand on this, the oppression of the indigenous peoples of these nations is ongoing. Its not in the past its still happening. Thats the line.

              • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                For all its faults and crimes, and Lord knows there are many, the country I’m in isn’t oppressing a people native to this region.

                • AwesomeLowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  My point being, go far enough back, and you WILL have found a people or tribe that got wiped out so another group could claim their territory. Where do you (arbitrarily) draw the line?

                  • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Words like “colonialism” or “settler colonialism” serve the purpose of naming injustices committed by empires.

                    They arent just bound to a space but also to a time. So the ongoing oppression against native palestinians, native americans etc is settler colonialism since it is about a people taking land from them without compensation. The roman empire also did settler colonialism. The difference is that the settler romans and indigenous population at this point are indistinguishable from each other. Through intermarriages and cultural exchanges there is not a roman-german and a germanic-german culture. And where there are cultural differences stemming from the days of roman settlerism these now coexist. There is no oppressor-oppressed dynamic anymore that characterizes settler colonialism.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Israeli jews have the right to life, freedom, safety. They have the right to a home in the Holy Lands.

        They don’t have the right to set up a Jewish supremacist apartheid state to deny the same rights to everyone else.

        The state that they have created and entrenched with genocide and “facts on the ground” no longer has legitimacy to exist in its present form.

        Ending this political entity to create a new democratic one is not genocide by any stretch of imagination.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        By that logic the creation of israel was a genocidal act in itself because it created a right for a people to eist where others were existing previously.

        If removing the right to exist of the Palestinian people is perfectly acceptable why is it necessary to keep chanting support for the rights of the aggressor?