So they got all that money from Uncle Sam’s CHIPS Act only to lay off 10,000 employees and make themselves “lean”. Govt funded unemployment.

    • _bcron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Only if you have conviction. Buying tech in the face of recession fears is one thing, but buying tech that supplies hardware to tech is another. It’ll probably sound like a whip cracking if the AI frenzy ever collapses hard

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        ARM and Qualcomm aren’t really involved with AI, and AI only makes up 15-20% of AMD’s revenue. Nvidia the one to watch out for, an entire 85% of their revenue is just AI and Mellanox. The Nvidia pump has been insane.

        • _bcron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The elephant in the room is the semiconductor ETF trade. People are actively trading ETFs more than actual tickers (SOXL is routinely one of the highest volume tickers day in and day out, and it’s been like this for a couple years now). Used to be that NVDA and AMD correlated with crypto because people would flip them on that basis, but not really the case anymore due to all that but I digress - if NVDA tanks, it’s really overweight in all these ETFs, ETFs tank, managers dump every holding in the ETF, and a bunch of non-AI semi stocks will wind up getting walloped about as hard

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s true, Nvidia’s fall will probably crash the whole market. SOXL tickers don’t trade in unison though, see how much Intel fell in the premarket without affecting other stocks. Of course, Intel is a tenth of the size of Nvidia.

            • _bcron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, the tail could definitely wag the dog. NVDA is now in the top 3 holdings of both SPY and QQQ, so if something like 2 Metas or 1 Microsoft started paring back and skipped on a product cycle, Nvidia’s forward metrics would suddenly be garbage, and between those couple companies, suddenly >15% of market is tanking and dragging entire sectors along for a wild ride

      • H4mi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        A bug or whatever in their 13’th and 14’th gen CPU’s makes them slowly but permanently degrade and cause crashes. Intel have not been handling the issue as you would hope since the discovery. Denying, downplaying, refusing a recall, refusing extended warranties, the lot. Now the lawsuits are cooking.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They sold fairy high end processors. They took like 3 months to fix the issue. Processors that were damaged will remain damaged. I think Intel will replace them though.

        • SoJB@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This saga has moved fast so I don’t blame you, just an FYI Intel has issued a statement saying the microcode update “will” fix all affected CPUs (it won’t, because the damage is physical) and will not be issuing a recall.

          We are witnessing one of the more obvious end-game states of capitalism. Intel continues to state they don’t give a single shit about this issue, and will not do anything about it.

          The corporate nihilism will continue until the collapse. More and more companies will act like this because why does anything matter when we can profit more today?

      • deadbeef@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not sure a short summary will cut it.

        They had no competition for a long period and ended up with an accountant CEO that caused their R&D to stagnate massively. They had a ton of struggling and failing to deliver all in most areas, and they wombled about releasing CPU generations with ~4% performance uplifts, probably saving a few bucks in the process.

        AMD turned back up again with Ryzen and Epyc models that were pretty good and and an impressive pace of improvement ( like ~14% generational uplifts ) that caused them such a fright that they figured out they had to ditch the accountant.

        Pat Gelsinger was asked to step up as CEO and fix that mess. They axed some obvious defective folks in their structure and rushed about to release 12th generation products with decent gains by cranking the power levels of the CPUs to absurd levels, this was risky and it kind of looks like they are being bit with it now.

        Server CPU sales are way down because they are just plain uncompetitive. They have missed out on the chunk of money they could have got from the AI bubble because they never had a good GPU architecture they could leverage over to use. They have been shutting down unprofitable and troublesome divisions like the Optane storage and NUC divisions to try and save money, but they are in a bad way.

        The class actions mentioned elsewhere in the thread are probably coming because the rush to make incremental improvements to 13th generation and 14th generation CPU’s resulted in issues with power levels and other problems that seem to be causing those CPU’s to crash and sometimes fail altogether.

      • Shaggy1050@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        IIRC they sold and shipped 2 generations of CPUs that were essentially defective and unrepairable.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s a good thing we gave them BILLIONS of Taxpayer Dollars! Otherwise they would have Laid Off Employees! Anyways we don’t have enough money in the Budget to Feed Starving American Children!

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I feel like they have the farm bet on Falcon Shores and (to a lesser extend) the Xe line now, and of course the foundry.

    It’d be great if the bad rumors and delays would stop… yeah…

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The money needs to return to the government. Some wealthy fucks are lining their pockets.

  • A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This sort of thing is increasingly making TSMC a monopoly as a fab. Due to the extreme economies of scale, fabbing looks like something that is hard to do well under the capitalist model. Perhaps a good time for some of the larger nations of the world to start publicly owned fabs (that publish their research instead of hoarding it) instead of ending up with the whole world reliant on one company that will eventually be able to name its price.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Two generations of bad cpu’s and their solution is get rid of the workers so they can keep their bonuses.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Part of the lackluster CPU problem is that Intel was pissing away their money on other adventures. CPUs were “in the bag”, so they kept spending money on other stuff to try to “create new markets”. Any casual observer knew their fundamental problem was simple: they got screwed on fabrication tech. Then they got screwed again as a lot of heavy lifting went to the ‘GPU’ half of the world and they were the only ones with zero high performance GPU product/credibility. But they instead went very different directions with their investments…

      For example they did a lot to try to make Optane DIMMs happen, up to and including funding a bunch of evangelism to tell people they’ll need to rewrite their software to use entirely new methods of accessing data to make Optane DIMMs actually do any better than NAND+RAM. They had a problem where if it were treated like a disk, it was a little faster, but not really, and if it were used like RAM it was WAY slower, so they had this vision of a whole new third set of data access APIs… The instant they realized they needed the entire software industry to fundamentally change data access from how they’ve been doing it for decades for a product to work should have been the signal to kill it off, but they persisted.

      See also adventures in weird PCIe interconnects no one asked for (notably they liked to show a single NVME drive being moved between servers, which costed way more than just giving each server another NVME and moving data over a traditional fabric). Embedding FPGA into CPUs when they didn’t have the thermal budget to do so and no advantages over a discrete FPGA. Just a whole bunch of random ass hardware and software projects with no connection to business results, regardless of how good or bad they were. Intel is bad for “build it, and they will come”.

  • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s crazy to me is that they are laying off more employees than the total number of full time employees I’ve work at for most companies.

    They are laying off 12% of their work force.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what happens when companies are too fucking big, and intel was essentially a monopoly for a while.

      I have interned at AT&T while at University, laying off a 1000 people would be less than 1 % for them.

      • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        After seeing this article I went down a rabbit hole and IBM isn’t even in the top 10 US of most employees. Here’s some of the popular ones from the top 30.

        • Walmart - 2.3 Million
        • Amazon - 1.61 Million
        • DHL - 594,000
        • FedEx - 547,000
        • UPS - 536,000
        • Home Depot - 456,000
        • Target - 415,000
        • Kroger - 414,000
        • Marriott - 411,000
        • Starbucks - 381,000
        • Walgreens - 333,000
        • Pepsi - 318,000
        • Costco - 316,000
        • Chase - 309,000
        • Lowes - 300,000
        • IBM - 282,000
        • CVS - 219,000
        • Bank of America - 212,000

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_United_States–based_employers_globally

        • ...m...@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          …i’m surprised to see DHL rank so highly in that list: what’s their domestic market focus, business-to-business freight logistics?..i seldom see DHL packages and when i do they’re almost exclusively of international origin…

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They won’t. That’s their springboard into that multi trillion dollar AI market everyone keeps talking about

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        unless some MBA decides that it’s better to sell single purpose expensive ai boards without video output

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    In January 2022, Intel announced an initial $20 billion investment that will generate 3,000 jobs,

    Not sure why Biden didn’t put any terms and conditions on giving away all this money 💰?

  • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I work in the industry and my understanding of the chips act is certain goals must be met in order to receive money. Something like in order to get this 50 million, you must buy 100 million of new equipment and facilities improvement. In order to get this 25 million you must have 50 million worth of new jobs. These requirements were also spread out over years so you couldn’t artificially inflate your work force or sell off equipment.

    Not saying Intel doesn’t suck, but I doubt they are getting chips act money now. Or they will have to have a big turn around in the next few years to do so. They certainly aren’t getting a free 8 billion.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      These layoffs will only be for a quarter or two. Just enough for the c-levels to unlock their full bonuses.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And create a glut in their labour market niche, which will take many years before the wages recover to what they were. In the current 20 year permanent labour shortage scenario, this is the way to prevent wages from increasing. Sure these demand shocks will create issues by they’re making the bet the lower overall expenses for wages will make it all worth it. This is them leveraging the imbalance of power been employer and employee

        • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If only there were some tried and tested method for the working class to join together and create a power block equal to the company in order to negotiate better pay and conditions and avoid these outrageous tactics. Pity

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wonder how many of the over 1000 VPs will get canned. You read that right. I worked there at the beginning of my career. I know a lot of people who are now VPs. Only one of them was actually any good. One guy couldn’t even manage his own staff meetings when he was a first line manager. Nice guy, not dumb or anything, but not brilliant, and a terrible organizer.