• breckenedge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Do we know where the sales mostly came from?

    Random speculation: Could be banks needing to pull out of the market due to the Fed signaling September rate cuts due to the higher-than-expected unemployment report. This will cause a drop in yield for savings, which would cause people to reduce what they have in those accounts.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Most of the money banks “have” they created it themselves (it’s called Fractional Reserve Lending and there’s a wonderful paper on it by somebody at the Bank Of England called “Money creation in the Modern Economy”).

      The whole “banks lend out depositors’ money” thing hasn’t been true since the 80s.

      Also nowadays most of the money in leveraged investments comes from the Money Markets (so rich people and pension funds) rather than banks.

      That said, your point still stands since a reduction of deposits might impact banks’ reserves (basically central banks force them to have the equivalent of about 3-5% of their loans as reserves), it would force a wider retrenchment of their loans, but by itself the impact of that on the entire leveraged investment universe should be limited because they’re not the main players in the Money Markets.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, they announced a rate hike in Japan, so that would seem to be a more immediate cause.

      In fact, there’s some analysis that suggests that Japan’s rate hike contributes to the dip in the other markets. Evidently it was a thing for people to borrow yen, use that to get other currencies, and then buy stock and sell the stock to repay the loans. Since the yen has climbed 14% versus the USD in the past few days, those loans suddenly became awfully expensive.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Random speculation: Could be banks needing to pull out of the market due to the Fed

      Japan stocks

      I mean… it could be. But most foreign stock markets aren’t directly tethered to the Fed.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh hey look a bunch of sheep - human and electronic - are reacting self destructively for no good reason. Must be any day ending with a ‘y.’

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nice call, I checked it and it is already above the levels of the Ukraine war. It’s a COVID-level or 2008-level event already.

      https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/^VIX/

      I think volatility is just a name used for variance of a basket of commodities, stocks, bonds that reflects an added price due to risk/uncertainty.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well it’s also caused the US market to dive, even overnight. Looks like the big correction is finally biting down.

    • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Usually war is a way to stop a recession/depression since its so profitable.

      The economy has been fucked far longer than the current conflicts that might actually start ww3

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Usually war is a way to stop a recession/depression since its so profitable.

        When you’re selling into a war market, you can make a lot of money. When you’re in that war market you tend to lose a lot of your expensive durable capital very quickly, which can get very expensive.

      • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is only profitable for a few in some places. War is not net good for “business”

        • Coreidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          In a stagflation scenario war is great for business. Otherwise you have no business at all.

          • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Isn’t WW2 the only example of this in practice? (and then only where the war did not reach, like the US or pre-1940 nazi germany)

            • Coreidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Ya it’s a pretty good example since WW2 was a stagflation scenario. It’s exactly the same scenario we are headed into. There’s a lot of similar polarities. Some may even argue that the next world war will break out precisely because of stagflation.

              As we descend further and further into economic depression (we’ve been in a recession for years) you’ll see the gears of war begin to spool up.

              • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                One would think we’d have learned to fix this inevitability by now…or is it intentional, to “fix the stagflation”?

                • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  The economy squeezes the proles for every penny they have, inflating the money faster than wages to ensure only the rich can afford to maintain.

                  Once the proles have been squeezed dry, have a major conflict and help save the failing banks and restore a “golden era” for a time.

                  Then do it all over again by starting to squeeze the masses.

                • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Part of the problem is getting everyone on board. Economic prosperity is a great way to justify keeping a government in charge. Major economic downturns usually cause a change of government and unrest with the government in general. Without a good economy as justification to keep a government in power, many governments turn to “defense” as a reason to stay in power.

          • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Sounds like the oligarch commandments.

            It’s like Hyperneoliberalism:

            “Nothing bad ever truly happens, guilt is subjective, nothing is real, everything is allowed, but if you take anything from me, it is the worst possible crime in all of history.”

      • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Girl, have you been following THIS WEEK’S news? Like right now is unlike any other time.

        War is historically used to pillage other people when times are rough. It doesn’t stop a recession; it doubles it and gives it to their opponent.

  • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Headline is a bit disingenuous as it is the most points (because the total points is higher) but only the second highest percentage (1987 still 1st).