• style99@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    When that convicted rapist gets defeated in the election, you can rest assured that he’ll resort to the same clumsy accusations of conspiracy and AI-generated this and that to try and deflect from the fact he’ll be the one trying to steal the election AGAIN.

    Maybe it’s about damn time that convicted rapist was actually punished and not responded to as if anything he said or did was worthy of discussion.

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Good, let Trump and his followers believe no one supports her or turns out to her events.

    They can be so safe in knowing that she is so unliked that they can stay home on election day.

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Before welcoming this as good news, be aware that democrats might also start thinking this misinformation is real, and decide to stay home and “not vote for a losing team”.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        What sense does it make to not vote for the loosing team? It is not like you bet with your ballot 😂

        • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Good question. The answer is: for a significant amount of people, politics is emotional - so what makes sense isn’t necessarily relevant.

  • Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Best argument is, if you believe it’s ai, come and see fit for yourself!

  • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s crazy that so many people get so hung up on the size of the crowds. Like are you going to vote based on who gets the bigger crowd? What happened to voting based on the candidate’s policies and track record as a politician?

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Trump only cares about winning , which includes pointless dick measuring contests.

    • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Trump chooses a topic, lies constantly about it and let people get tired fact checking. Would crowd size be on the news without Trump activating that subject?

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      In 2020, when Trump lost, one of the common lies spewed by the right to claim he really won was comparing the sizes of his rallies to Biden’s.

      Of course, that was during COVID restrictions, when the Dems were staying home and socially distancing, and the GOP pretended like the global pandemic wasn’t real.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Generally in elections, the mere idea that one party is favored over the other can convince people to vote for them. So yes, “fake it til you make it” is a legitimate campaign strategy.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Many people are just Size Queens. They can’t enjoy democracy unless they see a large crowd size.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    And the more we discuss it here, the more it legitimizes Trump’s AI argument. He’s laughing all the way to the ballot box.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The bullshit asymmetry principle is in full effect here.

    It takes nothing to make up bullshit and it takes hundreds, thousands, of times the resources to refute it.

    Meanwhile another hundred pieces of bullshit have been created.

    This is all just a bunch of red herrings and we waste so much time and effort into giving them attention.