• blargbluuk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Meanwhile I can’t even upload commercials for archival purposes without getting copyright strikes on my account. How is YouTube so bad at this.

    • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because that’s the way the legal system works.

      “Oops, had some harmful/illegal content on there? Nobody was /really/ hurt, or at least, we weren’t directly causing harm. I’ll take it down and eat a small fine.

      Vs

      “Oh I’m sorry, I’ll take down the 30s clip of your 90s movie. it has caused you 3million in damages? I’m so sorry, here’s some tools that will automate detection and removal of your property. I’m so sorry”

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Copyright protection is easy. Detection of novel forms of obscenity is hard.

      I’d argue it’s extremely hard, even.

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You know, as much as I hate it… “you know it when you see I but hard to definet” really is accurate.

        There’s plenty of things that aren’t outright illegal that are completely inappropriate around children.

        And if there are things that are context specific, it gets a lot harder to make a computer recognize a problem.

        Audio cues are easy to scan for and computers are pretty good at recognizing sounds, especially in regards to copyright detection (even if their interpretation of “fair use” clause is still fucked 6 ways)

        Video is a lot harder unless the computer is trying to match direct images (it’s a lot easier to recognize a still frame from The Avengers when it’s uploaded full size than it is to recognize a slightly warped, smaller cropped version with someone in front of it commenting on the video)

  • Johanno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ok I definitely get why you don’t want that content to be seen by children. I watched some of that shit.

    But I also must say most of the scenes won’t be understood by children. However the overall content is bad and makes people dumb.

    I am sure that you have children whose parents say, that’s a comic, nothing bad can happen there, watching that.

    6 million views on that shit…

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    meanwhile actual content creators are getting demonitized for happy wheel level gore (small red particles that come out when a stick man’s limbs come off)

    so dumb.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    According to the article, the videos feature nudity and possibly sexual harassment. Sexual harassment is unfortunately a fact of life, and it’s probably better that children recognise it, and see it condemned in the media they watch, than not know what it is at all. And you would have to be a puritan to think that children seeing naked people is somehow so terrible.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you bothered reading the very short article, it would be very clear that people are deliberately getting children subscribers than replacing the flow of new content with attempts to brainwash them or expose them to obscenity.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not even that, it’s to shock them so they keep engaging with the channel, telling their friends, etc. which increases ad impressions until they are caught.

        Then they create a new channel and start again.

        This is Elsagate 2 but with more nefarious tactics.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Imagine arguing that it’s actually good for kids to watch women being harassed. Peak incel.

      edit: Dude is literally a “race realist”. lol smh.

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    So Elsagate never stopped?

    This has to be a state actor thing, nobody else has the resources to deploy such a long lasting and changing content farm. Some psyops to fuck future generations of adults up?

  • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The whole: youtube has to be children friendly is the dumbest thing ever. If you let your children unsupervised browse YouTube you ar ea bad parent, if you let YouTube raise your children you are also a bad parent. Just because youtubers say frick, it’s not child friendly it’s annoying