• HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    thing with cruise ships is they basically can duck out taxes. Its like when casinos had to be boats and then you had them built on artificial lakes and they would go no where but detach from the dock for a period to meet the legal requirement. You could have docked cruise ships acting as all service condos if they would just let them have the same rules. Or better yet have special residential districts that just allow apartments like that to be built.

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      The idea is to not built new cruise ships. The old ones should be used and using them as apartment buildings is a good idea.

    • dillekant@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      They need diesel to run. Tax the diesel. Right now fossil fuels get subsidies. Just change that.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        thats the thing. since they operate mostly in international waters it gives them some sort of tax advantage and they supply from the lowest cost area and such.

        • dillekant@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure. But they still have to dock. If you tax it in half the countries, they will still have to pay half the time.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well if you tax what they already have on them. They can go for days. Not sure how many but I know at one point there were ones that went across the oceans. Not sure if they still do as its unpopular to have ones where you can’t disembark on see places regularly thats not the ship itself. Also not sure how far the monstroseties they have now can go with the waterparks on board. I suppose it could be farther with the size allowing for more fuel but maybe less given all the space used for crazy things like zip lines or whatever.

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can not do it with feudalism. The problem is that we need to take from the rich and allow every single human being a decent material lifestyle. We can not do that with feudalism, as that would mean the poor get poorer and the rich stay rich.

    • kwomp2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Development of history toward equity is blocked

      “So you wanna change it back to even worse times!!??”

  • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    SUVs, commercial airlines, and industrial beef? I wouldn’t lump those in as industries that only exist to grow capital, because they are producing useful products and services for consumers beyond the super rich. I get the feeling that these were included solely for environmental reasons.

    Not defending the environmental impact of SUVs and beef here, but commercial airlines can be better for the environment than cars. On average, it seems an airline emits about a quarter of a pound of CO2 per passenger per mile, which is about a third of what a passenger vehicle gives off (not per person, but not everyone vacations in groups.) Plus, they’re conveniently fast.