I remember when I was growing up, tech industry has so many people that were admirable, and you wanted to aspire to be in life. Bill Gates, founders of Google Larry Page, Sergey brin, Steve Jobs (wasn’t perfect but on a surface level, he was still at least a pretty decent guy), basically everyone involved in gaming from Xbox to PlayStation and so on, Tom from MySpace… So many admirable people who were actually really great…

Now, people are just trash. Look at Mark Zuckerberg who leads Facebook. Dude is a lizard man, anytime you think he has shown some character growth he does something truly horrible and illegal that he should be thrown in prison for. For example, he’s been buying up properties in Hawaii and basically stealing them from the locals. He’s basically committing human rights violations by violating the culture of Hawaiian natives and their land deeds that are passed down from generation to generation. He has been systematically stealing them and building a wall on Hawaii, basically a f*cking colonizer. That’s what the guy is. I thought he was a good upstanding person until I learned all these things about him

Current CEO of Google is peak dirtbag. Dude has no interest in the company or it’s success at all, his only concern is patting his pockets while he is there as CEO, and appeasing the shareholders. He has zero interest in helping or making anyone’s life pleasant at the company. Truly a dirtbag in every way.

Current CEO of Home Depot, which I now consider a tech company because they have moved out of retail and into the online space and they are rapidly restructuring their entire business around online sales, that dude is a total piece of work conservative racist. I remember working for this company, This dude’s entire focus is eliminating as many people as feasibly possible from working in the store, making their life living heck, does not see people as human beings at all. Just wants to eliminate anyone and everyone they possibly can, think they are a slave labor force

Elon musk, we all know about him, don’t need to really say much. Every time you think he’s doing something good for society, he proves you wrong And does the worst thing he can possibly do in that situation. It’s like he’s specifically trying to make the world the worst place possible everyday

Like, damn. What the heck happened to the world? You know? I thought the tech industry was supposed to be filled with these brilliant genius people who are really good for the world…

  • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    lack of “social intelligence”. They mostly rose through the ranks because their technical (or business) skill. They never had to act for benefit of others to advanve

    • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      And if not that, then the inverse applies: People who end up the wealthiest and most powerful do so by being the best at exploiting other people and systems.

      There’s a reason there are more and more sociopaths and narcissists the higher you get in a corporate structure, and its because such people truly do not care about the harm they cause, unless they get caught.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I don’t ever remember Bill Gates or Steve Jobs being good people. Or Jeff Bezos, trying to kill bookstores.

    The guys behind Google seemed okay at first and I think they really wanted to do good. But the way the company culture was built was toxic.

    But in the end it’s all about the greed. As soon as a company becomes public and whose stocks become available on the market, it turns to shit.

    Look at how Steam is going well and actually helping personal computing progress. Gabe Newell is doing a great job because he loves that he does and ensures the people who work for him do too.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    The link below isn’t the fundamental reason, but I think it helps to explain the shift in mindset. With the best of intentions and a desire to innovate and help people live better…the ersartz movement became corrupted by conspicuous consumption and a “disruptor” capitalist mindset:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_Earth_Catalog

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I remember when I was growing up, tech industry has so many people that were admirable

    Like, damn. What the heck happened to the world?

    Nothing happened to the world. You just grew up.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Greed. A sane person will walk away from working once they have enough saved to comfortably retire.

    $100 million can let you live comfortably forever, but there are plenty of people who want that much every year.

    Those are the folks who become ‘leaders.’

  • RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Capital demands growth. It doesn’t care how you do it. It doesn’t track or reward whether you did it by making the world better or by creating death squads and working with the CIA to kill thousands of people and overthrow a government that wanted to charge you taxes and limit the amount of land you could have.

    It’s been this way, and worse, for a long time. But bear in mind that Twitter gave us the ability to see how billionaires think. Modern media made them more accessible. They didn’t change, our knowledge of them did.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    “Leaders”

    They were always bad people but media shilled them as good guys… Buffet is similar example. We all LARPed it. Now we are learning the hard truth.

    These people a part of the owner class and control key portions of us and global economy.

    They are not the same as the rest of us. They know it and they act upon it.

    When you step on an ant do you even notice?

    They don’t either peasant, now get back to fucking cucking and making daddy some mother fucking money, boy

  • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    You listed a bunch of people who were “good”, but honestly, none of them were. You just weren’t necessarily aware of how Bill Gates treated anyone who had anything he wanted, or what Steve Jobs did to his daughter.

    Honestly, the lesson here is All CEOs Are Bad, it’s just that some are only moderate psychopaths instead of ones that skin cats and then stuff them into mailboxes.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    When tech isn’t controlled by the user then the user is controlled by the dev, and power corrupts.

    Some are born selfish and others are molded by our insistence you strive for money to survive.

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    It was a lot easier to pretend to be a good person when every moral failure you make wasn’t broadcast around the world the moment it was discovered. Case and point, look into Bill Gates more. He wasn’t always a respectful guy, got caught up in the whole “filthy communists” schtick when the government was investigating his company, advocates for more restrictive control of aid distribution favoring manufacturers more than those he’s trying to help, conflicts of interest in his charity, opposing twitters ban of Trump after the insurrection, etc.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Power corrupts people. On top of that, the capitalist machine isn’t satisfied with “just okay” performance. It’s infinite growth, or nothing. Once you hit the upper limit of what you can deliver, you start delivering the same, but with a lot of cut corners

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Capitalism is the death of society and aligns the interests of people and corporations alike towards a race to the bottom for maximum exploitation.

    • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      What economic concept are you proposing that’s better than the current systems in place?

      At least government regulations can help keep capitalism in check, but taking that too far leads to monopolies and dictatorships.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    The good ones retire or have important, but not the most profitable/public facing jobs.

    The other Apple Steve, Steve Wozniak founded the EFF and was the tech guy at early Apple. Jobs was the business guy.

    John Carmack is a controversial figure, but he’s actually the tech wiz kid the techbros dream they are. He seems to just be interested in pushing technology and had some choice words for Meta when he left. They should have let him have his axe to carry around.

    • linux2647@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      *helped found. He provided some initial funding and served on the board, but he wasn’t a founder.

      • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        In 1976, he co-founded Apple Computer with his early business partner Steve Jobs.

        -Wikipedia

        Woz was the (head) tech brains behind Apple. Jobs was just the asshole that made unreasonable demands of the techs, overpriced it & marketed it.

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Bill Gates was a huge piece of shit in his heyday, rivalling the Zuckerberg and Musks of today, and Jobs was an abusive narcissist shitcunt on a surface level.

    Tom and Zuckerberg both came from the same time. Zuck was shit since day 1, today has nothing to do with it.

    I think you just have some very rose tinted glasses.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Before Microsoft, programmers were treated like factory workers by HP and IBM and setup in large open floor rooms like a secretary pool from the 1960’s. Gates thought programmers were important and gave every programmer a private office.

      Gates did dirty tricks to competitors even to tiny ones they could have bought out (stacker). But he was never Musk’s level of evil.