At a crucial juncture of the war against Russia, President Volodymyr Zelensky has undertaken a major reshuffle of his government, insisting “new energy” in government was needed “today.”

“These steps are only associated with strengthening our state in various sectors — international politics and diplomacy are no exception,” he said on Sept. 4 during a press conference in Kyiv with Irish Prime Minister Simon Harris.

While lawmakers and political analysts close to the president told the Kyiv Independent the reshuffle is a way of bringing “new energy” to a tired government apparatus, those who are critical of Zelensky say it’s more about the President’s Office, run by Andriy Yermak, willing to consolidate power even more.

MBFC
Archive

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I really, really, really hope that Zelenskyy rides off into the sunset the day after this war is over and goes into history as a hero. He was outstanding in early 2022 and has been okay since then, but there are moments when power seems to be going to his head.

    • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      “Whoever fights monsters should see to it that he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”

      -Nietzsche

      The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution.

      -Hannah Arendt

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      He’s by definition an autocrat at this point.

      He didn’t have an election and just remained in power.

      A reminder for those whole will automatically respond “Ukraine is fighting for its life”

      It definitely is, but the US had an election in the middle of the Civil War, and during WW2.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        But during WW2 Britain didn’t hold elections. Did this turn Britain into an autocracy?

        And by the way, you literally can’t hold elections if the aggressor is certain to attack polling stations. The US never had this threat, neither during the Civil War nor during WW2. Not a single US city was ever attacked by an enemy nation.

      • Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Ukraine’s constitution forbids an election during a state of emergency. This isn’t him overriding precedent, this is codified into law.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        The US didnt have to account for the likelihood of russian psyops and election interference destabilizing the country during these critical times though.