• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 个月前

      I respect the sentiment, but is the amount of plastic in an SD card really that significant? There’s probably more in just the packaging alone.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 个月前

          This is more like taking the first step, getting distracted by a cool bug, finding an interesting stick, and going home to show Mum your cool stick.

          An SD card lasts for years, and the amount of plastic in one is negligible. It’s just not an issue.

          • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 个月前

            An SD card lasts for years, and the amount of plastic in one is negligible. It’s just not an issue.

            Hark! The ghosts of countless generations of short-sighted polluters cry out in complacent, rationalizing unison!

            It’s not about expecting one model of memory card to save the Earth. It’s about moving away from needless production of toxic materials, everywhere.

            And if you don’t care, nobody’s going to force you to read The Lorax, but please don’t go around shitting on people’s appreciation for even the small things.

            • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 个月前

              Worrying about the plastic in an SD card just feels like bike-shedding to me, but keep up the good fight, I guess.

              • UnityDevice@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 个月前

                Yeah it’s the equivalent of finding two dollars on the ground and getting excited because at this rate you’ll be a billionaire soon enough. There’s less than 2g of plastic in an SD card - the buttons on your shirt probably weigh more.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 个月前

      Likely far more energy and pollution needed to manufacture this though so overall a loss for the earth.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 个月前

          You still need a lot of energy to recycle steel. Less than mining by far but still a lot.

          • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 个月前

            But compared to plastic from virgin fossil fuels?

            We as a society are going to need memory cards.

            What do you think they should be made out of?

            • bluGill@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 个月前

              Need to be examined on e case by case basis but plastic often comes out aheadi

              • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 个月前

                If you penny pinch and don’t want to pay the environmental cost, sure plastic might come out cheaper.

                But when you take into account the triple bottom line, plastic comes out behind.

          • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 个月前

            In a sustainable world, energy can and should be cheaper than raw materials. We are only harvesting a tiny fraction of the solar energy hitting the earth, to say nothing of wind and geothermal power. Rolling out more renewables and energy storage and using some of the surplus power to switch from extracting new resources to recycling our waste would greatly lower our footprint.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 个月前

        You can swap out centralized energy sources (relatively speaking) overnight as greener sources become cheaper/more available compared to retooling whole industries away from plastic

        It’s the same thing with electric cars, yea it might plug in now to a dirty energy source, but that energy source could be a green energy source tomorrow without you ever knowing and importantly not having to buy a new car or change any other infrastructure to take advantage of it

        A power line is a power line, it doesn’t care if the electricity going through it was derived from a dirty power plant or solar or nuclear

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 个月前

        While we’re at it, let’s get back to all metal phones! Screw this glass back shit.

        For the “Wireless” charging people:

        It’s a gimmick, nothing of value is lost

          • cm0002@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 个月前

            True wireless charging would definitely, the kind where your phone being in the mere vicinity of the “base station” allows it to start charging. From an actual distance larger than a handful of centimeters. That would be a feature worthy of the sacrifice of a metal body and being stuck with glass

            The “Wireless” charging marketing gimmick is just as bad as the “Hoverboard” gimmick vs a real Hoverboard a la Back to the Future.

            Its basically just a plug shifted from a socket to the back of the phone, but worse. It’s almost always slower and saves a second or 2 at most from having to plug/unplug it. Some minor pros, but not worth having to be saddled with annoying and fragile glass backs. You still need to take it out of your pocket, place it in a designated spot, and can’t use it all that well while in the designated spot and still have it charge.

            It’s a gimmick so companies could say their phones totally have wireless charging so they didn’t have to spend the R&D money to develop actual wireless charging and you bought into it hook, line and sinker.

            There were some promising developments on real wireless charging, but ever since the fake gimmick caught hold it’s been awfully quiet. Another victim of marketing I suppose.

            • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 个月前

              I use a magsafe charger in both the vehicles I drive on a regular basis, and a charging mat at home, both are extremely useful.

              You’re talking absolute nonsense.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 个月前

              What a weird think to insult someone over. It does what it says it does and I don’t get why you’re drawing the line on what “true” wireless charging is when I’m not plugging a wire into my phone. You think I “fell for a marketing gimmick” despite using the feature almost exclusively for the past 12 years? How is it a gimmick if I get value out of it?

              I like having a clean desk and not accidentally yoinking my phone off. I like not adding wear and tear to the USB port because it sucks when they break. I like that I’ve had a dozen or USB cords die but never once had to toss a wireless charger.

              You aren’t the arbiter of what’s useful. You not finding value in wireless charging doesn’t mean it’s a useless gimmick. Get off damn your high horse

              • cm0002@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 个月前

                Lol never said it was useless, only the value doesn’t outweigh the sacrifices. Gimmicks can have some usefulness and utility and still be gimmicks.

                The gimmicky part is that smartphone companies got you hooked into a product that barely fills just enough peoples value thresholds that they could avoid developing real wireless charging.

                In a world where this fake shit didn’t take hold we could have had real wireless charging by now, if you think the “wireless” charging is good now, just think what true wireless would be like. You could walk into a room and your phone just starts charging with 0 effort. None.

                But all the major companies stopped their R&D on it because consumers like you lapped the gimmick up and continue to. All that’s left are a handful of startups working on it, so it’s going to be years still.

                • glimse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 个月前

                  From your first comment:

                  It’s a gimmick, nothing of value is lost

                  You’re right, you didn’t say it was useless! You said it was valueless. My bad, huge difference…

        • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 个月前

          “All right team this is the single most dropped item in the history of mankind we need to make this thing tough what are we gonna manufacture the backing out of?”

          “Glass?”

          “…….Brilliant!! You’ve got upper management written all over you, Jacobs!”

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 个月前

      Doesn’t the steam deck use micro SD cards, I don’t think that these full-sized ones are going to be much help for those guys. Unless of course they come out with stainless steel micro SD cards but that doesn’t seem likely for obvious reasons.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 个月前

          I guess if they made the chips small enough that the MicroSD body is just a shell, same thing happened with full sized SD cards (there was a time the whole space inside them was used, now it’s usually a small part of the front and the rest is just the body shape for compatibility).

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 个月前

    Unironically a good idea. I can see these really helping to increase the chances of memory survival in camera applications where the camera has a high chance of being physically destroyed. Also a metal body reallllly helps conduct heat out of the flash, which will increase their lifespan in continuous-write applications.

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 个月前

      Stainless is extra bad at conducting heat considering it’s a metal, but it’s still way better than plastic. I hope they make an aluminum version at some point.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 个月前

        Yes, stainless is “bad”, compared to other metals. But like you also mentioned, it’s loads better than plastic.

        I’d doubt they make an aluminum one, it’s probably not worth the tooling.

        When dealing with only 100-200mW, even a small change in thermal conductivity will make a big difference.

  • MightyCuriosity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 个月前

    All the comments are fun and games but they could’ve used aluminium which is way cheaper. It’s nothing more than a marketing gimmick.