Women “would have their uteruses removed when they turn over 30,” Naoki Hyakuta, leader of the Conservative Party of Japan, said in a stream on his YouTube channel on Friday.

On the channel, he also said that he would make it law for “women who are single after 25 years old not to be allowed to marry.”

(…)

Later, Hyakuta posted an apology on his X account. “I cannot deny that the expressions were too harsh,” he said. “I apologize for those who were offended.”

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Unchecked access to the internet by people who aren’t emotionally mature enough to handle it.

      Allowing all of humanity onto the internet when 30% of people still believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows was a mistake.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Allowing all of humanity onto the internet when 30% of people still believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows was a mistake.

        You are referrering to children. Right? And I’ve lived a considerable amount of my life taking this as an urban legend. Not a fact.

        • 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Here’s a real number. 56% of Americans read at or below a sixth grade reading level.

          When complex topics like the economy are discussed, _at least _ 56% can’t comprehend the concepts because they lack the vocabulary. They do not understand how government works, or their own bodies, or diplomacy, or historical contexts. They are not capable of being part of many important national conversations.

          Now couple this with the fact that Democrats are terrible at messaging and simplifying complex policy into digestible sound bites while Republicans have perfected it, and you can easily see how we get to where we are now.

          • qyron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            My sincere apologies upfront for my next sentence: I do not fathom what 6th grade reading level entails. Not in the USofA nor in my little barbarian european country.

            What I am aware is that children’s books and how they are taught to read is a diservice for them, with an overwhelming(ab)use of unnecessary images and infantilizing story telling.

            This isn’t an argument to have children read “War and Peace” as a bed time story but kids could dispense with all the garbage being thrown at them (including school text books) and most parents happily buy them and instead having something that actually challenges intelectually.

            And using a dictionary doesn’t hurt, unless you drop it on your toes.

            • datavoid@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              In America they seem to prefer banning books that might cause some sort of empathy or critical thought.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          My apologies. I totally flipped some numbers. It’s actually 7% of people (not children) surveyed believe that chocolate milk is from brown cows.

          Now the survey wasn’t too robust with 5000 total respondents but it’s still embarrassing that that number isn’t like “Seven American adults in total believe chocolate milk is from brown cows”

          Here’s a CNN fluff piece on it https://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/16/us/chocolate-milk-help-trnd/index.html

          • qyron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            No need to apologize. At best, I have to do it, because you managed to make me laugh while at the same time lose a little bit of hope for humanity.

            How can someone be that uninformed?!

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve been saying it since 2015, but it bears repeating!

      The global conservative propaganda machine — lead by the US and Russia — is using all of the data obtained from surveillance capitalism to target, A/B test, and iterate on psychological warfare across social media in real-time.

      There really isn’t much difference between persuading you to buy a product and persuading you to vote for a political party; they both attack the same weaknesses and vulnerabilities. People who knew history were always saying that this is what surveillance capitalism would lead to eventually. I don’t think any of us thought it would happen so quickly, but the lack of regulation and highly centralized nature of social media meant that a relatively small operation could access 90% of the Internet using population.

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Persuading you to vote for their guy, or if you’re disinclined to do so, persuading you to not vote by instilling disgust/outrage (see also: “Genocide Joe”) or just a blackpilled sense of powerlessness.

      • 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        And many of us men are just as baffled by it. I honestly don’t understand why there are so many men – who I’m sure shutter at any mention of a woman’s period – that feel the need to control every aspect of reproduction and do so in the most cruel ways.

        But also, the women who voted in support of those men are exponentially more baffling to me.

        My brain hurts trying to understand it.